On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 11:55 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 10:44 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:22 +, Edward Catmur wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Iva
27;t ( not sure if anyone does ) care about any non-gdb debugger.
So, can you give us a wild guess about the disk space ? How much does it
take on your system and how many packages do you have installed ?
And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be
present ?
--
Cheers,
Ivan Yosifov.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
le it. It makes sense to able to debug
a problem right away rather than having to reemerge things first, to get
the debugging info.
How much disk space should the debug info consume ?
--
Cheers,
Ivan Yosifov.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:52 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> are running vesafb-tng and have >=1GB RAM then try
> turning off vesafb-tng
Why ?
--
Cheers,
Ivan Yosifov.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 14:44 +0300, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 22:41 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > I've put together a kind of FAQ for the most common maintainer-wanted
> > problems:
> >
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/docs/mw-faq/
> >
t;
licence.txt 11-Sep-2005 22:27 745
license.txt 11-Sep-2005 22:27 745
I guess one should go away.
--
Cheers,
Ivan Yosifov.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
reiserfs ).
If you don't want to obliterate the data, your only option is deleting
some files.
--
Cheers,
Ivan Yosifov.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ork does he have a
choice really ?
--
Cheers,
Ivan Yosifov.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 12:11 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Sunday 07 August 2005 12:03, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
> Well ppc doesn't have SSE
Then why is the ppc keyword there ?
> but there are many people running Gentoo non machines that does *not* support
>
ing ebuild emerge. Given the valgrind-3.0.0
keywords ( -* ~amd64 ~ppc ~x86 ) I guess most people on those arches
have SSE anyway. AFAIK all amd64's have SSE, I don't know about ppc, and
I doubt anyone is running Gentoo on i686. You should expect a few bugs
about it though.
--
Cheers,
Ivan Yosifov.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
least not with x86 - x86
contains both CPUs like P4 that have SSE and i686 that does not.
I am not sure if it is better, but you can
cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep flags | grep sse
and die if not found.
Cheers,
Ivan Yosifov.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Thanks, Alin.
This was the type of constructive response I was hoping to provoke.
Don't get me wrong - I like genlop, however software "final state" does
not exist IMO, and bugfixing is hugely important with any software.
Also, by "dead upstream" I mean that the page does not even exist
anymore,
Team view on the matter.
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 20:56 -0600, R Hill wrote:
> Christian Parpart wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 July 2005 20:29, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
> >> What's up with genlop ?
> >> There are 9 open bugs, some including trivial fixes ( like #97049 ),
> >
Hello Everyone,
What's up with genlop ?
There are 9 open bugs, some including trivial fixes ( like #97049 ),
the homepage http://pollycoke.org/genlop.html ( as listed in the
ebuild ) is dead. If my understanding is correct, unmaintained packages
are removed from the tree.
Thanks,
Ivan Yo
14 matches
Mail list logo
