Alin Nastac wrote:
I find active devs metric a useful one.Until a year ago, the number of
active devs was linearly rising, but in last year we seem to hit a ceil
(175) - either recruiter team is understaffed or our organization
reached the maximum number of individuals who can work together
Nathan L. Adams wrote:
Jory, I take issue with that. I am not ranting. I am proposing a way to
*improve* QA.
Some thoughts from a humble user:
Any improvement must neither excessively waste developer nor user time,
it is the most scarce resource. To optimize this, the common case must
be made
