Hi,
The hash does not need to be lowercase. It can be a quick fix in portage to
accept any case.
Thanks,
Sheng Yu
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, September 23rd, 2022 at 10:03, Michał Górny
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's next part of GLEP 74 updates,
uggestions.
Thanks,
Sheng Yu---
GLEP: 78
Title: Gentoo binary package container format
Author: MichaŠGórny
Sheng Yu
Type: Standards Track
Status: Draft
Version: 1
Created: 2018-11-15
Last-Modified: 2021-09-13
Post-History: 2018-11-17, 2019-07-08, 2021-09-13
Content-Type: text/x-rst
---
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, September 13th, 2021 at 17:02, Michał Górny
wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:08 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2021, Sheng Yu wrote:
> >
> > > -The archive contains a number of fi
ed repositories
> to find packages it can use without having to sync a lot of data - if
> you know the exact filename then a simple GET tells you if it is there
> or not.
Interesting concept, although this should be counted in the
binpkg-multi-instance. A predictable configuration hash, rather than
relying on index to get the difference between variants.
Something like:
bar/foo-1.0-r2-e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb9.gpkg.tar
Thanks,
Sheng Yu
Hi,
I attached second revision of the new draft of GLEP78 "Gentoo Binary
Package Container Format"
Please feel free to give any comments and suggestions.
Thanks,
Sheng Yu---
GLEP: 78
Title: Gentoo binary package container format
Author: MichaŠGórny
Sheng Yu
Type: Stand
container and overwriting it later.
But since both Manifest and signature size are variable, how much space to
reserve becomes an issue. Too small, the package manager needs to copy the
whole package, too big will require adding a padding file.
Thanks,
Sheng Yu
matches need to be added.
Thanks,
Sheng Yu
