Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON

2010-12-03 Thread Richard Freeman
On 12/03/2010 07:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:35:14 +0100 > Sebastian Pipping wrote: > >> to better communicate USE_PYTHON we could use: > > The first question that comes into my mind is -- why do we need > to communicate that? I think that USE_PYTHON is a pretty specific

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON

2010-12-03 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 12/03/10 14:16, Michał Górny wrote: > Then the question would be -- if that version causes so much trouble > and requires a careful re-consideration of upgrade schema, why didn't > anyone mask it yet? I didn't dare to. Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON

2010-12-03 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:29:14 +0100 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Depending on how fast we can fix that, communicating status quo before > that may still help reduce user frustration. Especially as we have an > unmasked 2.7.1 in tree for a few days now. Then the question would be -- if that version

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON

2010-12-03 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 12/03/10 13:23, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Good point. Still, as of now that's where to put USE_PYTHON. ^^^ referring to /etc/make.conf itself. > I'm unsure if that's a reason strong enough to add it. ^^^ referring to the man page of 'make.conf'. Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON

2010-12-03 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 12/03/10 13:05, Michał Górny wrote: > The first question that comes into my mind is -- why do we need > to communicate that? I think that USE_PYTHON is a pretty specific > variable which should be used only if specially required (i.e. to keep > multiple Python versions ready for use). > > What

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON

2010-12-03 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 12/03/10 12:50, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 03-12-2010 11:35:14 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> to better communicate USE_PYTHON we could use: >> >> - a portage news entry > > why portage? I'm speaking of GLEP 42. No idea if pkgcore or paludis support these. That's why i said "portage". h

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON

2010-12-03 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:35:14 +0100 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > to better communicate USE_PYTHON we could use: The first question that comes into my mind is -- why do we need to communicate that? I think that USE_PYTHON is a pretty specific variable which should be used only if specially required

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON

2010-12-03 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 03-12-2010 11:35:14 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > to better communicate USE_PYTHON we could use: > > - a portage news entry why portage? > - notifications from within ebuilds > > - a users guide counterpart of >http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/Python/developersguide.xml > > - menti

[gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON

2010-12-03 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello, to better communicate USE_PYTHON we could use: - a portage news entry - notifications from within ebuilds - a users guide counterpart of http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/Python/developersguide.xml - mentioning in 'man make.conf' This is overdue and has some urgency. Are you volu