Francesco Riosa schrieb:
Also I'm offering again, some space and bandwidth in germany
Maybe we could also set up the box from bug #108379 (as mirror?) for
patches. It has plenty of bandwith sitting around and not doing that
much currently ;)
Greetz
Jokey
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 02:08, Brian Harring wrote:
freebsd stages being the usual example [1].
s/stages/source tarballs/
The stages are in another section of the mirror, the source tarballs were
there when we were not in the main tree. Now the same tecnique is used by
openbsd/netbsd.
--
Alec Warner wrote:
Those get uploaded and look fine but after 6 months they are suddenly
being removed by the script.
There is a distfiles whitelist[1] for this exact purpose...isn't there?
[1]
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/mirrors/overview-distfile.xml
Thanks for the
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Truly, the sarcasm doesn't help. It takes a potentially reasonable
grievance and reduces it to just the author appearing to be a jerk.
Sorry, I have no intention to cause any ill fate. Is meant explanatory.
- Stefan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
Those get uploaded and look fine but after 6 months they are suddenly
being removed by the script.
There is a distfiles whitelist[1] for this exact purpose...isn't there?
[1]
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/mirrors/overview-distfile.xml
On Monday 23 October 2006 18:51, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. I was not aware of this when I was looking for a
solution badly back then. Must be a rather recent development.
i guess that depends on your definition of recent ... it's been in place
since June/July
Still the
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:51:59AM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
Those get uploaded and look fine but after 6 months they are suddenly
being removed by the script.
There is a distfiles whitelist[1] for this exact purpose...isn't there?
[1]
