On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 21:43 +, Peter wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:01:02 -0400, Mike Pagano wrote:
Since you mentioned my name in your e-mail I figured I had something to
do with the delay on your becoming a developer, however, having
consulted bugzilla I find that this is not the case. Rat
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:06:16 -0400, Mike Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:43:16 + (UTC)
> "Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That's a laugh! Problem is that no devs seem to get approved in a
>> timely fashion. And, any potential devs would be rather turned off by
>> the goings on he
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:43:16 + (UTC)
"Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a laugh! Problem is that no devs seem to get approved in a
> timely fashion. And, any potential devs would be rather turned off by
> the goings on here. You guys seem to try and stifle innovation at
> every turn -
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:01:02 -0400, Mike Pagano wrote:
> Maybe a recruiting drive to help with the maintenance. A typical
> business brings on new blood and assigns them just that role to free up
> more senior developers for more complicated projects.
>
> New developers should definitely meet a s
