On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 11:10 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Over the years we've had a fairly consistent stream of suggestions that
we should open up the e-build maintaining process to users instead of
just devs. The main arguments against it are the security issues and an
expectation that it
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:10:47AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Over the years we've had a fairly consistent stream of suggestions that
we should open up the e-build maintaining process to users instead of
just devs. The main arguments against it are the security issues and an
expectation
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
As I've said all along - I do not have any problems with Project
Sunrise. I have a problem with it being an official project hosted on
*.gentoo.org, as I fear most users will think hey, it's official,
it's hosted on *.gentoo.org - it can't be that bad. Judging from
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 02:15:12PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
Would moving it from overlays.g.o to overlays.dev.g.o,
overlays.experimental.dev.g.o help ? It could then be viewed
officially unofficial as the tinderboxing repository's I've
been working on.
It wouldn't be the ideal solution to
Would moving it from overlays.g.o to overlays.dev.g.o,
overlays.experimental.dev.g.o help ? It could then be viewed
officially unofficial as the tinderboxing repository's I've
been working on.
I think it won't make a big difference. It's stated clearly that the sunrise
overlay is experimental
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 11:10 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Over the years we've had a fairly consistent stream of suggestions that
we should open up the e-build maintaining process to users instead of
just devs. The main arguments against it are the security issues and an
expectation that it
(...) Is it just that now we have a lot of
developers who are willing to allow users to break their boxes?
Just tell me one thing, are you breaking your box everytime you use an
overlay?
--
Best Regards,
Peper
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 18:26 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
I have a problem with it being an official project hosted on
*.gentoo.org, as I fear most users will think hey, it's official,
it's hosted on *.gentoo.org - it can't be that bad. Judging from the
few users who
