I would like to ask about adding systemd USE flag to use.stable.mask
to let us stop needing to revbump packages with optional systemd support
when stabilizing them.
Are you ok with that?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would like to ask about adding systemd USE flag to use.stable.mask
to let us stop needing to revbump packages with optional systemd support
when stabilizing them.
Are you ok with that?
Am I interpreting the impacts of
El dom, 24-02-2013 a las 09:35 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would like to ask about adding systemd USE flag to use.stable.mask
to let us stop needing to revbump packages with optional systemd support
when stabilizing
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:23:52 +0100
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would like to ask about adding systemd USE flag to use.stable.mask
to let us stop needing to revbump packages with optional systemd support
when stabilizing them.
Are you ok with that?
Ok, committed that myself ;).
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:35:27 -0500
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would like to ask about adding systemd USE flag to use.stable.mask
to let us stop needing to revbump packages with optional systemd support
when
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Isn't there any way to unmask systemd USE flag on your local setup
(running testing systemd)?
Wasn't aware that could be done. That makes sense all-around - it
even allows you to run the stable packages with the unstable
