Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Ben de Groot
On 29 August 2012 01:36, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 08/28/2012 05:35 PM, Sylvain Alain wrote: >> Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would >> like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. > > udev might or might not eventually get forked

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Luca Barbato
On 08/28/2012 05:35 PM, Sylvain Alain wrote: > Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would > like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. udev might or might not eventually get forked to avoid systemd borg-approach. mdev works fine for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Jeff Horelick wrote: > I think this issue is currently in far too murky of a state to get any > well-informed issue from the council. Perhaps when the issues get > hammered out a bit more, but not currently. I tend to agree. Taking a position for or against some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Jeff Horelick
On 28 August 2012 12:59, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 08/28/2012 10:35 AM, Sylvain Alain wrote: >> Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would >> like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. >> >> I saw on the forum this thread : >> https:/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/28/2012 10:35 AM, Sylvain Alain wrote: > Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would > like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. > > I saw on the forum this thread : > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-934678-highlight-.html

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 28/08/12 11:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Sylvain Alain > wrote: >> Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, >> but I would like to know if there's any official position about >> the current

Re: [gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Sylvain Alain wrote: > Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would > like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. There is not. But thanks for starting the flamewar just the same. :) > > I saw on the

[gentoo-dev] Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

2012-08-28 Thread Sylvain Alain
Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would like to know if there's any official position about the current situation. I saw on the forum this thread : https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-934678-highlight-.html and maybe it could be part of a solution to have OpenR