maillog: 01/06/2005-23:25:00(+0900): Jason Stubbs types
...
Perhaps, further down the track we'd be able to work out something with the
build farm thingy; check for linkage and warn if things specified in RDEPEND
aren't linked against and build up a whitelist from it... Perhaps repoman
will
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:25:00PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
I'd be for having RDEPEND required to be set manually. ;)
As would I, actually...
Granted it's a useful convenience, but it also makes nailing the deps
down much harder. Personally down the line, I'd like to see packages
that
On Monday 30 May 2005 08:51 pm, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:32:45AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 29 May 2005 01:48 am, Alec Warner wrote:
The actual fix to the bug is a minor one, a small check to Repoman to
make sure ebuilds have both DEPEND and RDEPEND set;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As suggested by SpanKY in the bug report itself but never done until now
I'll gladly start up the discussion.
The bug report[1] is a request from the embedded team to change how
DEPEND and REDEPEND are assigned in an ebuild. At present the
