[gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Ben de Groot
Since CIA.vc is dead [1], I think we should be looking into a replacement service, or host our own [2]. Is infra already looking into this? 1: http://shadowm.rewound.net/blog/archives/245-CIA.vc-is-dead.html 2: http://www.donarmstrong.com/posts/switching_to_kgb/ -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Ben de Groot schrieb: Since CIA.vc is dead [1], I think we should be looking into a replacement service, or host our own [2]. I understand that ohloh is already tracking us (sometimes at least). http://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo/ Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
Hi Ben, On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: Since CIA.vc is dead [1], I think we should be looking into a replacement service, or host our own [2]. Is infra already looking into this? 1: http://shadowm.rewound.net/blog/archives/245-CIA.vc-is-dead.html 2:

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins rafaelmart...@gentoo.org wrote: Maybe someone with good cvs knowledge can contribute a hook for irker [1], so we can have #gentoo-commits flooding our irc clients again! :) Why exactly are we still using cvs? Rather than building

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Michael Mol
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins rafaelmart...@gentoo.org wrote: Maybe someone with good cvs knowledge can contribute a hook for irker [1], so we can have #gentoo-commits flooding our irc clients

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Jeff Horelick
Well nenolod has written a CIA - Irker proxy that (I believe) takes commit messages designed to go to CIA and makes irker read them and such, but i haven't looked into it: https://github.com/nenolod/irker-cia-proxy On 1 October 2012 11:21, Rafael Goncalves Martins rafaelmart...@gentoo.org wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know to what depth this has been discussed in the past, but if you use git, you also get an HTTP transport, which has a useful feature: You could simplify updating the tree on end-users's machines by using caching

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins rafaelmart...@gentoo.org wrote: Maybe someone with good cvs knowledge can contribute a hook for irker [1], so we can have #gentoo-commits flooding our irc clients

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Michael Mol
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know to what depth this has been discussed in the past, but if you use git, you also get an HTTP transport, which has a useful feature: You could

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Rafael Goncalves Martins rafaelmart...@gentoo.org wrote: Have you ever thought that people may be not really interested on this move? or don't have the time to work on it? or don't care enough to spend time on it? or just wants someone else to do the work? I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 01/10/2012 11:29, Rich Freeman wrote: Where else would one discuss it? gentoo-scm Yes, there is a mailing list for that. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Rich Freeman wrote: I doubt everybody is going to be happy if somebody convinces infra to shut down cvs without any discussion first. I would do exactly that, actually. There's been years of discussion. There's even a mailing list for discussion. //Peter

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Gregory M. Turner
On 10/1/2012 10:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: Looking at the tracker [1], we need a pre-upload hook (I'm not quite sure why), an rsync conversion script, the ability to validate the converted tree, and documentation. There is still an open bug for commit signing, and I'm not quite sure why as

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Gregory M. Turner wrote: fuck everyone, we are doing this, here is the changeover date. Well put. When is the date? I suggest October 5th, 18:00 UTC. //Peter

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Why exactly are we still using cvs? Rather than building enhancements for cvs, why not just migrate everything to git, and spend our time building the git hooks/etc necessary to make this work? The CIA/irc bot issue is

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Why exactly are we still using cvs? Rather than building enhancements for cvs, why not just migrate everything to git, and spend our time building the

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 01/10/2012 13:17, Peter Stuge wrote: Gregory M. Turner wrote: fuck everyone, we are doing this, here is the changeover date. Well put. When is the date? I suggest October 5th, 18:00 UTC. And I suggest we stop here. We have a different mailing list for this and it's getting tiring. --

Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: And I suggest we stop here. We have a different mailing list for this and it's getting tiring. Ok, looking at the archives as far as I can tell nobody is really monitoring that list (a post requesting a status