On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
> On 01/10/2012 17:51, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
>>
>> Anyhow, I get it: administering the vcs for a huge project such as
>> Gentoo is very hard work. If I somehow gave some other impression, I'm
>> sorry. Perhaps Rich and I insensitively
On 01/10/2012 17:51, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
>
> Anyhow, I get it: administering the vcs for a huge project such as
> Gentoo is very hard work. If I somehow gave some other impression, I'm
> sorry. Perhaps Rich and I insensitively voiced our shared assumption
> that Gentoo's continued reliance
If you're going to paint me and the other folks expressing opinions as
entitled mouth-breathers, certainly you can't expect not to hear any
reply because it's "off-topic"!
On 10/1/2012 2:00 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 01/10/2012 13:54, Rich Freeman wrote:
I don't think we can keep the di
On 01/10/2012 15:53, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> > Then you probably don't know half the Gentoo developers
> I think they are the ones who should fork. :)
Unfortunately the problem is that they tend to linger around even after
forking...
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — h
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > Another idea I have, besides the go-ahead+fix what breaks, is that
> > after everything has broken, Gentoo developers will not be spamming
> > this mailing list like three-year-olds screaming rude complaints
> > about how things do not work and calling infra bad names,
On 01/10/2012 15:21, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> With all due respect,
> ..
>> you calling for shutdown dates
> ..
> all without changing a stupid subject
> line to at least show you're no longer speaking about the original topic
> (it's not like people can be psychic that yo
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> With all due respect,
..
> you calling for shutdown dates
..
> is obnoxious.
I don't know about respectful, but oh well..
Another idea I have, besides the go-ahead+fix what breaks, is that
after everything has broken, Gentoo developers will not be spamming
this mailin
On 01/10/2012 14:41, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Noone said it's easy.
«This just strikes me as something that is about at the point where we
could "just do it."»
This was Rich at 11.29 Pacific Time.
> Several said it needs to just-be-done, without further consensus.
> I support that. Everyone also agr
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Honestly, this whole thread, with the exception of Rafael, makes me
> facepalm incredibly, because everybody is saying "it's easy!"
> without asking the people who have done the work up to now and will
> have to manage it.
Noone said it's easy.
Please don't put words i
On 01/10/2012 13:54, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I don't think we can keep the discussion off -dev forever though. It
> seems like we're close to being able to implement, which means lots of
> changes that impact all devs. I can't imagine that we'd want to
> implement that without some kind of council
10 matches
Mail list logo
