On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
> No, an example of _how building a whole package with -ffast-math_ was
> brought up, and you turned it into "something that it should apply to"
> (which is false, and stupid to say).
Perhaps this is part of the issue then. I didn't not
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 25/02/13 23:21, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> My point was just that:
>> 1. No, the fact that entire packages fail to build/operate using
>> -ffast-math is not a valid bug.
>
> From your email the message was the opposite, maybe a not got lost?
On 25/02/2013 23:21, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
> wrote:
>> Of course dealing with flags _per functions_ is not possible, as flags
>> apply at the very least to a translation unit...
>
> A translation unit can contain a single function, or a bunch of
On 25/02/13 23:21, Rich Freeman wrote:
> My point was just that:
> 1. No, the fact that entire packages fail to build/operate using
> -ffast-math is not a valid bug.
>From your email the message was the opposite, maybe a not got lost?
> 2. If individual packages DO carefully use -ffast-math and
On 25/02/13 22:32, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> Though people that use -ffast-math / -fLTO / -fuse-linker-plugin should
>> be on their own, thus I drop -ffast-math because it breaks my browser;
>> but that doesn't mean that those ricer flags should s
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
> Of course dealing with flags _per functions_ is not possible, as flags
> apply at the very least to a translation unit...
A translation unit can contain a single function, or a bunch of
functions that you want to apply the flag to.
>
>
On 25/02/2013 22:57, Rich Freeman wrote:
> A sword that cuts two ways - judging understanding by an email is a
> dubious proposition, otherwise we wouldn't need job interviews. :)
> It is just as likely that we're simply miscommunicating.
Did you not just say there:
"Calculating scroll bar movem
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
> On 25/02/2013 22:32, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> That isn't the same as saying that we can just break it in cases where
>> it actually is appropriate. Calculating scroll bar movement is
>> exactly the sort of thing that this flag was actuall
On 25/02/2013 22:32, Rich Freeman wrote:
> That isn't the same as saying that we can just break it in cases where
> it actually is appropriate. Calculating scroll bar movement is
> exactly the sort of thing that this flag was actually designed for -
> you don't care if it is off by 1/100th of a pi
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> Though people that use -ffast-math / -fLTO / -fuse-linker-plugin should
> be on their own, thus I drop -ffast-math because it breaks my browser;
> but that doesn't mean that those ricer flags should stop stabilization.
If we're talking about f
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:58:08 +0100
Piotr Szymaniak wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:03:01PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still
> > 47 open bugs blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now
> > would be a good time to take a look a
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:03:01PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open bugs
> blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good time
> to take a look at them.
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/390247
There's an ugly bug [1]
On 02/24/13 23:45, Alex Alexander wrote:
> On 25 Feb 2013 06:53, "Ryan Hill" wrote:
>>
>> I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open
> bugs
>> blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good time
>> to take a look at them.
>>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.
On 25 Feb 2013 06:53, "Ryan Hill" wrote:
>
> I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open
bugs
> blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good time
> to take a look at them.
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/390247
Can't you just smell all those Gentoo s
I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open bugs
blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good time
to take a look at them.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/390247
--
gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgetslearn a language baby, it's that kind of pl
I just added gcc-4.7.2 to the tree, and I'd like to unmask it in a couple
weeks. I don't see anything I'd consider a blocker on the tracker*, but
95 open bugs is still a lot. If you have a bug blocking the tracker please
take a look at it soon. Many of these are trivial and could make good
bugsd
16 matches
Mail list logo
