Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 13:21 -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote: Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible. Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was supposed to be completely autonomous,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-03 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 03/10/2005-08:56:57(-0400): Chris Gianelloni types On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 13:21 -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote: Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible. Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran into some interactivity. I was under the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-03 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds | would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was | use-flag based RESTRICT... No, because then that would encourage even more people

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-03 Thread Jan Kundrát
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds | would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was | use-flag based RESTRICT... No, because then that would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-03 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 19:39 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds | would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-03 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 07:39:05PM +0200, Jan Kundr?t wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds | would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 17:51 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds | would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was | use-flag based

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 13:23 -0500, Brian Harring wrote: C) 15 hour upgrade/build, hanging an hour into it is going to be an ass biter. This is actually why I've been doing something I would normally *not* do and have been breaking up some games ebuilds that require a CD into a $foo and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-03 Thread Jan Kundrát
Brian Harring wrote: Ebuilds are non-interactive compile/install... that's the design, and intention of them. Sure, I thought that RESTRICT=interactive would just tell the user that she would have to provide some feedback in cases like those that wolf31o2 mentioned (games from CD). I don't

[gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-02 Thread Dan Meltzer
Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible. Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should take place in ebuild ...

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-02 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:21:58 -0400 Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran | into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was | supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should | take place

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-02 Thread Dan Meltzer
This is what I have found thanks to research of friendly people! http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/29810 (pkg_config only interactive) and, somewhere in dev manual it does say test can be interactive also.. not sure about that though On 10/2/05, Fernando J. Pereda [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-02 Thread Maurice van der Pot
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: Also when FEATURES=test ? In such case the mod_php and php packages are broken. They ask you to save, reject or send the result of the tests if I'm not mistaken Even if they succeed? The point of test is to get some additional

Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-02 Thread Fernando J. Pereda
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:02:02PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | | Also when FEATURES=test ? In such case the mod_php and php packages | | are broken. They ask you to save, reject or send the result of the | | tests if I'm not mistaken | | Yup. There're quite a few broken test packages in the

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge

2005-10-02 Thread Jakub Moc
2.10.2005, 20:13:52, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:01:08PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote: | On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: | Also when FEATURES=test ? In such case the mod_php and php packages | are broken. They ask you to save,