2010/1/17 Krzysiek Pawlik :
> On 01/17/10 18:20, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>>> Please: When you run tools which break checksums/dates of the database,
>>> give the user the possibility to decide whether he really wants this.
>>
>> Good point, I didn't realize that. However, I'd rather fix the tool
Le dimanche 17 janvier 2010 à 13:37 +0100, Ben de Groot a écrit :
> 2010/1/17 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." :
> > I wonder why the affected package (eselect-opengl) couldn't run
> > lafilefixer itself. It's mandatory for all users, and would save a lot
> > of frustration.
>
> Indeed. You can simply have thi
> >>> Please: When you run tools which break checksums/dates of the database,
> >>> give the user the possibility to decide whether he really wants this.
> >> Good point, I didn't realize that. However, I'd rather fix the tool (for
> >> example to update the portage database).
> On the other hand,
On 1/17/10 7:28 PM, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
> On 01/17/10 18:20, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>>> Please: When you run tools which break checksums/dates of the database,
>>> give the user the possibility to decide whether he really wants this.
>> Good point, I didn't realize that. However, I'd rather
On 01/17/10 18:20, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> Please: When you run tools which break checksums/dates of the database,
>> give the user the possibility to decide whether he really wants this.
>
> Good point, I didn't realize that. However, I'd rather fix the tool (for
> example to update the por
On 1/17/10 6:57 PM, Vaeth wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> I wonder why the affected package (eselect-opengl) couldn't run
>> lafilefixer itself. It's mandatory for all users, and would save a lot
>> of frustration.
> It is not mandatory: You could as well re-emerge the a
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> I wonder why the affected package (eselect-opengl) couldn't run
> lafilefixer itself. It's mandatory for all users, and would save a lot
> of frustration.
It is not mandatory: You could as well re-emerge the affected packages
(shown by revdep-rebu
2010/1/17 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." :
> I wonder why the affected package (eselect-opengl) couldn't run
> lafilefixer itself. It's mandatory for all users, and would save a lot
> of frustration.
Indeed. You can simply have this version of eselect-opengl depend on
lafilefixer and run it in pkg_postinst.
On 01/17/2010 01:26 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Howdy guys,
> please review the attached file and suggest updates to in.
> I was asked for this thing going stable due to its being dependency of
> new nvidia-drivers.
>
> Also this thing is probably blocker for the bug on eselect-opengl i just
> open
On 1/17/10 12:26 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> please review the attached file and suggest updates to in.
> I was asked for this thing going stable due to its being dependency of
> new nvidia-drivers.
I wonder why the affected package (eselect-opengl) couldn't run
lafilefixer itself. It's mandatory f
Howdy guys,
please review the attached file and suggest updates to in.
I was asked for this thing going stable due to its being dependency of
new nvidia-drivers.
Also this thing is probably blocker for the bug on eselect-opengl i just
opened:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301271
Cheers
11 matches
Mail list logo
