Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia

2005-07-05 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 07:35 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > On that note.. Would you mind compiling it one time with a gcc built > with +boundschecking and then enabling CFLAGS+= -fbounds-checking as a > basic q/a check. Reason being that if nobody has ever included it > anywhere the chances of it being

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia

2005-07-05 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:24 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 07:35 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > > On that note.. Would you mind compiling it one time with a gcc built > > with +boundschecking and then enabling CFLAGS+= -fbounds-checking as a > > basic q/a check. Reason being

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia

2005-07-05 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 07:35 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > On that note.. Would you mind compiling it one time with a gcc built > with +boundschecking and then enabling CFLAGS+= -fbounds-checking as a > basic q/a check. Reason being that if nobody has ever included it > anywhere the chances of it being

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia

2005-07-05 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 14:11 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 11:25 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > A bit late I know, but just for interest sake .. virtuals is usually > > used when more than one package usually provides the same compatible > > api/tool ... which basica

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia

2005-07-05 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 11:25 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > A bit late I know, but just for interest sake .. virtuals is usually > used when more than one package usually provides the same compatible > api/tool ... which basically means pcmcia-cs and pcmciautils do the same > thing and cannot be i

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia

2005-07-05 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 11:18 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > Hi, > > Starting from linux-2.6.13-rc1 the PCMCIA subsystem has been patched to > exports certain internals to sysfs, which allows using hotplug for > handling insertion/ejection of 16bit PCMCIA cards. > > For this to work, a new pa

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia

2005-06-30 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 11:48 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 11:18 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > > For this to work, a new package called pcmciautils [1] will need to be > > added to portage. Therefore, a new virtual/pcmcia (which will default to > > sys-apps/pcmcia

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia

2005-06-30 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 11:18 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > For this to work, a new package called pcmciautils [1] will need to be > added to portage. Therefore, a new virtual/pcmcia (which will default to > sys-apps/pcmcia-cs in base/virtuals for now) will be added as well. ... and it is don

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia

2005-06-29 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 11:18 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > For this to work, a new package called pcmciautils [1] will need to be > added to portage. Therefore, a new virtual/pcmcia (which will default to > sys-apps/pcmcia-cs in base/virtuals for now) will be added as well. I forgot to menti

[gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia

2005-06-29 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, Starting from linux-2.6.13-rc1 the PCMCIA subsystem has been patched to exports certain internals to sysfs, which allows using hotplug for handling insertion/ejection of 16bit PCMCIA cards. For this to work, a new package called pcmciautils [1] will need to be added to portage. Therefore, a n