On Thursday 03 January 2008, Roy Marples wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:49 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
while is_older_than is negotiable, removing KV_* is not. those are
pretty tight utility functions which duplication in $random-packages will
only lead to problems (especially
On Thursday 03 January 2008, Roy Marples wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 16:24 +, Roy Marples wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:50 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
it also means a deprecation notice needs to be added here and
everywhere else that has changed. perhaps create a small script
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 16:26 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
that's fair. i'd also add that forcing the value into conf.d/clock
forces a reliance on openrc and prevents alternative init packages
(which we've seen people use). i know debian uses /etc/localtime, any
one know what other distro
On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 16:26 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
that's fair. i'd also add that forcing the value into conf.d/clock
forces a reliance on openrc and prevents alternative init packages
(which we've seen people use). i know debian
At: default.mk, the _SUBDIR loop is somehow incorrect, as it will not
pass subdir make result to rule.
So if rule fails the build still considered a success.
make[1]: *** [start-stop-daemon.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make[1]: Leaving directory
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:58 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
At: default.mk, the _SUBDIR loop is somehow incorrect, as it will not
pass subdir make result to rule.
So if rule fails the build still considered a success.
make[1]: *** [start-stop-daemon.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 12:02 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 1/3/08, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I knew there was a reason for not adding digests :)
I've removed them for now.
Why remove?!?!?!
This way we cannot use layman in order to sync with your changes.
Because Gentoo/Linux
On 1/3/08, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:58 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
At: default.mk, the _SUBDIR loop is somehow incorrect, as it will not
pass subdir make result to rule.
So if rule fails the build still considered a success.
make[1]: ***
On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Roy Marples wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 20:16 +0100, Thomas Pani wrote:
It took me some time to find /etc/conf.d/modules, but it's certainly
useful :).
It also means all config files, with the exceptions of fstab and rc.conf
are in conf.d and not some random
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:50 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
it also means a deprecation notice needs to be added here and everywhere else
that has changed. perhaps create a small script that takes
the /etc/modules.autoload.d/ directory and converts it into the
corresponding
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 16:24 +, Roy Marples wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:50 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
it also means a deprecation notice needs to be added here and everywhere
else
that has changed. perhaps create a small script that takes
the /etc/modules.autoload.d/
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:49 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
while is_older_than is negotiable, removing KV_* is not. those are pretty
tight utility functions which duplication in $random-packages will only lead
to problems (especially considering the history of making sure they were
coded
Richard Brown wrote:
While this thread remains highly entertaining, I'm sure as a past
gentoo developer Roy remembers that we don't generally use gentoo-dev
to bug fix poorly written makefiles, we have a bugzilla where people
interested in fixing it can help, or perhaps upstream have a list
On 1/1/08, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It took me some time to find /etc/conf.d/modules, but it's certainly
useful :).
It also means all config files, with the exceptions of fstab and rc.conf
are in conf.d and not some random dir :)
Took me a while too... Some ChangeLog
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 16:39 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 1/1/08, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It took me some time to find /etc/conf.d/modules, but it's certainly
useful :).
It also means all config files, with the exceptions of fstab and rc.conf
are in conf.d and not some
On 1/2/08, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those functions were removed from functions.sh as only update-modules
still uses them. udev does use KV_to_int though. I don't really want to
add those functions back. Although we could trivially add is_older_than
as a C applet built into rc.
So
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:15 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 1/2/08, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those functions were removed from functions.sh as only update-modules
still uses them. udev does use KV_to_int though. I don't really want to
add those functions back. Although we could
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:41:00 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List
2008 is here and it's time for some change!
OpenRC is now ready for testing. There are no ebuilds in the tree, but
some are available here [1] that offers a baselayout-2 shell that
pulls in openrc-. I'll
Again...
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/local/layman/openrc/sys-apps/openrc/openrc-.ebuild
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got: 3666
!!! Expected: 3629
On 1/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for adding digest, but:
Calculating
Hi List
2008 is here and it's time for some change!
OpenRC is now ready for testing. There are no ebuilds in the tree, but
some are available here [1] that offers a baselayout-2 shell that pulls
in openrc-. I'll just offer a git ebuild for the time being, so bugs
can be fixed fast without
Uh, forgot the link :)
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/uberlord.git;a=summary
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Publish to layman?
On 1/1/08, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh, forgot the link :)
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/uberlord.git;a=summary
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Alon Bar-Lev kirjoitti:
Publish to layman?
Done. layman -a openrc after the web nodes have synced from CVS.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thanks!
Works!
Roy, why didn't you digest and commit the files?
On 1/1/08, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev kirjoitti:
Publish to layman?
Done. layman -a openrc after the web nodes have synced from CVS.
Regards,
Petteri
���^����(� ��X��X�
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 18:55 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Thanks!
Works!
Roy, why didn't you digest and commit the files?
Dunno. Have now done so.
Thanks
Roy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Thanks for adding digest, but:
Calculating dependencies /!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/local/layman/openrc/sys-apps/openrc/openrc-.ebuild
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got: 3629
!!! Expected: 3602
On 1/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 19:22 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Thanks for adding digest, but:
Calculating dependencies /!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/local/layman/openrc/sys-apps/openrc/openrc-.ebuild
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got: 3629
!!!
Works fine here (x86). Having set both RC_{QUIET,VERBOSE}=no it's a
little more verbose than what I'm used to (especially udev loading
madwifi) but that's early enough in the boot sequence not to bug me.
It took me some time to find /etc/conf.d/modules, but it's certainly
useful :).
Regards,
Thomas Pani a écrit :
Works fine here (x86). Having set both RC_{QUIET,VERBOSE}=no it's a
little more verbose than what I'm used to (especially udev loading
madwifi) but that's early enough in the boot sequence not to bug me.
It took me some time to find /etc/conf.d/modules, but it's
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 20:16 +0100, Thomas Pani wrote:
Works fine here (x86). Having set both RC_{QUIET,VERBOSE}=no it's a
little more verbose than what I'm used to (especially udev loading
madwifi) but that's early enough in the boot sequence not to bug me.
That's a udev issue, not a
30 matches
Mail list logo
