maillog: 30/04/2005-13:27:44(+0100): Elfyn McBratney types
> On Saturday 30 Apr 2005 13:07, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote:
> > On Saturday 30 April 2005 13:12, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > > On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:31:17 +0200
> > >
> > > Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On
On Saturday 30 Apr 2005 13:07, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2005 13:12, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:31:17 +0200
> >
> > Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Friday 29 April 2005 16:38, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > > > Heh, I get th
On Saturday 30 April 2005 13:12, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:31:17 +0200
>
> Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 29 April 2005 16:38, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > > Heh, I get that after every invocation of emerge. :)
> > >
> > > Yep. That's the scanning
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:31:17 +0200
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 29 April 2005 16:38, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > Heh, I get that after every invocation of emerge. :)
> >
> > Yep. That's the scanning of all installed packages for any provided
> > virtuals.
> Why no
On Friday 29 April 2005 16:38, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Heh, I get that after every invocation of emerge. :)
>
> Yep. That's the scanning of all installed packages for any provided
> virtuals.
Why not let Portage print that before scanning?
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Linux Security Team
On Saturday 30 April 2005 05:25, Jan KundrÃt wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~jstubbs/docs/virtuals-glep.txt
>
> Please forgive me if this ml is a bad place for suggestions.
>
> Ad "overrides" - what about "per-virtual" preferencies:
> What happens if packages A and B provide
Jason Stubbs wrote:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~jstubbs/docs/virtuals-glep.txt
Please forgive me if this ml is a bad place for suggestions.
Ad "overrides" - what about "per-virtual" preferencies:
What happens if packages A and B provide functionality X, packages B & C
provide Y *and* you prefer B fo
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 01:51:33 +0900
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~jstubbs/docs/virtuals-glep.txt
>
Oh, i hadn't seen this version of the proposal yet, it's quite
good :)
--
TGL.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Saturday 30 April 2005 01:38, Lina Pezzella wrote:
> > My
> > as yet unnumbered virtuals glep would negate this altogether. ;)
>
> M - is there a draft of this somewhere?
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jstubbs/docs/virtuals-glep.txt
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgp9D3X4jCmwA.pgp
Description: PGP signa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My
as yet unnumbered virtuals glep would negate this altogether. ;)
M - is there a draft of this somewhere?
- --Lina Pezzella
Ebuild/Porting Co-Lead
Gentoo for Mac OS X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCcmL/NJ9STR
On Saturday 30 April 2005 00:59, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:38:58 +0900
>
> Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yep. That's the scanning of all installed packages for any
> > provided virtuals.
>
> Maybe that's a stupid idea, but I wonder whether removing em
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:38:58 +0900
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep. That's the scanning of all installed packages for any
> provided virtuals.
Maybe that's a stupid idea, but I wonder whether removing empty
PROVIDE files from the vardb could save some time here. I see
that in grabf
On Friday 29 April 2005 23:26, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> On Friday 29 Apr 2005 15:11, Jason Wever wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > The initialization time of portage is directly related to the number of
> > > packages installed. Cutting out excess ebuilds from the tree won't
On Friday 29 Apr 2005 15:11, Jason Wever wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > The initialization time of portage is directly related to the number of
> > packages installed. Cutting out excess ebuilds from the tree won't speed
> > this up at all. Cutting out excess ebuilds won't ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Jason Stubbs wrote:
The initialization time of portage is directly related to the number of
packages installed. Cutting out excess ebuilds from the tree won't speed this
up at all. Cutting out excess ebuilds won't have much effect o
On Friday 29 April 2005 22:29, Jason Wever wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Athul Acharya wrote:
> >> Purging old versions for a few seconds speed increase in portage [snip]
> >
> > Few seconds? Try few miliseconds, if anything, at all, ever. The
> > original email in this thread gave me the best lau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Athul Acharya wrote:
Purging old versions for a few seconds speed increase in portage [snip]
Few seconds? Try few miliseconds, if anything, at all, ever. The
original email in this thread gave me the best laugh I've had in a
while,
> Purging old versions for a few seconds speed increase in portage [snip]
Few seconds? Try few miliseconds, if anything, at all, ever. The
original email in this thread gave me the best laugh I've had in a
while, until I realized it came from a dev; then I was very sad.
Athul
--
gentoo-dev@gen
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 18:40 +0200, Heinrich Wendel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Portage is slow? How to make it faster? By removing unused ebuilds!
>
> I wrote a little script to check which ebuilds in portage aren't used
> anylonger, here the result:
>
> Total packages checked: 9076
> Total ebuilds checke
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:40:23PM +0200, Heinrich Wendel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Portage is slow? How to make it faster? By removing unused ebuilds!
Define "faster". All this would do is cut down on a couple of stats
per pkg; the # of ebuilds per pkg isn't a huge issue, the scanning of
vdb and Config
Hi,
Portage is slow? How to make it faster? By removing unused ebuilds!
I wrote a little script to check which ebuilds in portage aren't used
anylonger, here the result:
Total packages checked: 9076
Total ebuilds checked: 18662
Total ebuilds to remove: 4643
Of course the script can't detect ev
21 matches
Mail list logo
