On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect by
default would do a lot more good at this stage than test.
Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing
On 4/20/07, Rob C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing
keywording/stablingin my eyes this is sufficient.
Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a weekly
Rob C wrote:
On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect by
default would do a lot more good at this stage
Rob C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect
by default would do a lot more good at this stage than test.
Arch teams normally have collision-protect
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing
keywording/stablingin my eyes this is sufficient.
V-Li
Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
weekly basis. So either this
Rob C wrote:
On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect by
default would do a lot more good at this stage
On 20/04/07, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob C wrote:
On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect
by
On 20/04/07, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob C wrote:
On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
weekly basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are
not acting as you describe.
Can you provide some bug numbers to backup this claim?
Matthias
--
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Langer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
weekly basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are
not acting as you describe.
Can you
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 19:56 +0200, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Langer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
weekly basis. So either this
Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
On 4/19/07, Steve Long wrote:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect by
default would do a lot more good at this stage than test. There are
several packages I have come across where this has picked up files not
being removed from earlier
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect by
default would do a lot more good at this stage than test.
Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing
keywording/stablingin my eyes this is sufficient.
V-Li
signature.asc
13 matches
Mail list logo
