On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 03:16:29PM -0800, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:00:31 -0600
> > Ryan Hill wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, please. Once these get fixed then we can drop localepurge.
> >
> > That's a lot of bugs to fix, and the
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:00:31 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
>> Yes, please. Once these get fixed then we can drop localepurge.
>
> That's a lot of bugs to fix, and the way LINGUAS now works, we could
> at least do with a QA check that helps fi
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:00:31 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Yes, please. Once these get fixed then we can drop localepurge.
That's a lot of bugs to fix, and the way LINGUAS now works, we could
at least do with a QA check that helps figure out which packages break
when new translations are added to ne
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:58:06 +0100
Piotr Szymaniak wrote:
> localepurge will be removed from portage [1]. As I was (/am) heavy
> user of it I found it funny that "linguas takes care of the proper
> locale installation" [2]. Maybe it should, but there's some major
> failure in lots of packages.
I
Piotr Szymaniak posted on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:58:06 +0100 as excerpted:
> Long story short: localepurge will be removed from portage
If the maintainers are interested, perhaps gentoolkit could adopt it?
That would mean it's on most portage-based systems anyway, in my
experience.
The FEATURES
