mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
> Instead I think we should be improving "eselect profile" to support
> multiple inheriting /etc/make.profile files in a user friendly fashion,
> and in the end removing 249 subprofiles, instead of adding 28+.
>
I vote for this one. A prof
Hehe,
http://dev.gentoo.org/~antarus/essays/mixin-profiles.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 antarus users 2653 Jun 4 2006 mixin-profiles.txt
-A
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
>
>> Instead I think we should be improving "esel
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:40:00PM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
>
> > Instead I think we should be improving "eselect profile" to support
> > multiple inheriting /etc/make.profile files in a user friendly fashion,
> > and in the end remo
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:16 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:40:00PM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> > mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
> >
> > > Instead I think we should be improving "eselect profile" to support
> > > multiple inheriting /etc/make
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 02:02:46AM +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:16 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> > While I agree in principle within mixins, no one here is discussing
> > the QA affect of it- right now we can do visibility scans of
> > combinations of gnome + amd64 + 201
