On 14/02/15 19:41, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
If only libav and ffmpeg developers would stop breaking their API on
every release...
Just break it once and for all. It's so sad that I still can't upgrade
from libav-9 because of this.
Feature request: could you stop breaking the API for a couple of
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:34:57 +0100
Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sadly the time I can spend doing opensource stuff can be compressed
from time to time and maybe is nicer develop interesting stuff such
as useful API and features than write tons of s:CODEC_ID:AV_CODEC_ID:
over
On 09/02/15 10:17, Alexis Ballier wrote:
(nb: you can see that this precise one is mostly fixed already.)
I hope it is completely fixed already =\
lu
On 8 February 2015 at 03:20, Jason A. Donenfeld zx...@gentoo.org wrote:
The votes keep pouring in. Ffmpeg is the preference of Gentoo users, as well
as the majority of Gentoo developers, and by a very relevant upstream
author.
I don't think a forum poll, or a poll of users for that matter is
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:19:18 +
Ian Whyman thev00...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 8 February 2015 at 03:20, Jason A. Donenfeld zx...@gentoo.org
wrote:
The votes keep pouring in. Ffmpeg is the preference of Gentoo
users, as well as the majority of Gentoo developers, and by a very
relevant
El dom, 08-02-2015 a las 12:19 +, Ian Whyman escribió:
[...]
So long as libav is effectively dictating the API then by defaulting
to ffmpeg we are just delaying the inevitable breakage htting the
tree. I know there are people who think we shouldn't break unstable,
but I personally prefer a
On 08/02/15 17:13, Alexis Ballier wrote:
What we need instead of such endless debate happy bashing (been
there, done that) is people doing the work. That's what will improve
the distribution. I thought letting libav be the default would improve
that;
If nobody helps fixing the orphaned and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiya,
On 07/02/15 05:16, Ben de Groot wrote:
I discussed this beforehand with said developer on IRC.
Ok, that wasn't clear from the commit message.
Do you think a news item to explain this situation and giving
explicit instructions for users who
On 7 February 2015 at 10:08, Mike Auty ike...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...] I
was concerned that a warning which had been in place in package.mask
since September was removed by a different developer than the one who
put it in place,
I discussed this beforehand with said developer on IRC.
and
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:57:35 +0100 as
excerpted:
I tried to choose the options' wording carefully, in order to get as
much information as possible from a single poll.
Thanks for your wisdom in wording (which, contrary to some others, I
agreed with, because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiya,
On 06/02/15 08:48, Duncan wrote:
Daniel Campbell posted on Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:55:05 -0800 as
excerpted:
As a user and prospective developer, why? Transparency is
important to open communities like Gentoo's, and reading the
discussions
Daniel Campbell posted on Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:55:05 -0800 as excerpted:
On 02/04/2015 04:43 AM, Mike Auty wrote:
It's fine to have disagreements, but airing them in front of the users
like this is not an ideal situation...
As a user and prospective developer, why? Transparency is important
12 matches
Mail list logo
