Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5))

2012-06-30 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul- packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips. If a package has dependencies, then those dependencies are required to have at least the

GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5))

2012-06-29 Thread Thomas Sachau
Brian Harring schrieb: You need a glep here frankly; per the norm, if you want things to move faster, then put in time- aka, generate a patch against PMS, write a patch for portage, etc, you get the idea. The bit re: a PMS patch is mostly that in looking at your proposal... well, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5)

2012-06-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:07:01 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Do you prefer having everything hardcoded in PMS or can you accept outsourcing bigger code pieces into some sort of eclass (i am thinking about some external code base, which can be duplicated by the package manager with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5)

2012-06-19 Thread Thomas Sachau
Thomas Sachau schrieb: Duncan schrieb: Thomas Sachau posted on Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:31:40 +0200 as excerpted: Since i am not that sure about my ability to write formal specs, i am presenting my first draft for further review and suggestions for improvement. Just a format suggestion. Call

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5)

2012-06-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:16:39 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Since there is again no response at all, it seems like everyone is ok with this, so i will propose to add this to the next council agenda for EAPI-5 addition. Got a diff for PMS? -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5)

2012-06-19 Thread Thomas Sachau
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:16:39 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Since there is again no response at all, it seems like everyone is ok with this, so i will propose to add this to the next council agenda for EAPI-5 addition. Got a diff for PMS? Last time

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5)

2012-06-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:54:07 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:16:39 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Since there is again no response at all, it seems like everyone is ok with this, so i will propose to add this to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5)

2012-06-19 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:54:07PM +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote: Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:16:39 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Since there is again no response at all, it seems like everyone is ok with this, so i will propose to add this to the next

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5)

2012-06-19 Thread Thomas Sachau
Brian Harring schrieb: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:54:07PM +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote: Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:16:39 +0200 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Since there is again no response at all, it seems like everyone is ok with this, so i will propose to add

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5)

2012-06-17 Thread Thomas Sachau
Duncan schrieb: Thomas Sachau posted on Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:31:40 +0200 as excerpted: Since i am not that sure about my ability to write formal specs, i am presenting my first draft for further review and suggestions for improvement. Just a format suggestion. Call it nitpicky if you

[gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5)

2012-06-17 Thread Duncan
Thomas Sachau posted on Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:02:26 +0200 as excerpted: I suggest you look for a better client to handle the line wrapping better. ;-) In the meantime, the same file attached with wrapped lines. Thanks. (And I'm actually involved upstream tho not as a coder, so maybe...) --

[gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5)

2012-06-16 Thread Duncan
Thomas Sachau posted on Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:31:40 +0200 as excerpted: Since i am not that sure about my ability to write formal specs, i am presenting my first draft for further review and suggestions for improvement. Just a format suggestion. Call it nitpicky if you want, and yes, my