Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

2011-04-03 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Saturday, April 02, 2011 07:02:54 AM Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: >> On 3/31/11 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> > Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need >> > to specify the version. >> >> Thank you, but it's st

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

2011-04-02 Thread Christoph Mende
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 16:41 -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Saturday, April 02, 2011 07:02:54 AM Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > > On 3/31/11 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > > Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need > > > to specify the version. > > > > Thank you, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

2011-04-02 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Saturday, April 02, 2011 07:02:54 AM Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > On 3/31/11 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need > > to specify the version. > > Thank you, but it's still not enough for chromium. The virtual uses > > >=ffmpeg-0

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

2011-04-02 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 3/31/11 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need > to specify the version. Thank you, but it's still not enough for chromium. The virtual uses >=ffmpeg-0.6, and chromium is known to be broken with =ffmpeg-0.6_p25767, not just 0.6. B

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

2011-03-31 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need to specify the version. Note for everyone: if pkg works with all current implementations DO NOT specify the version for the virtual :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

2011-03-29 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 29.3.2011 16:05, Alexis Ballier napsal(a): > Its already starting to be a mess with the versions differing... I can't wait > to see the next API break... I really wish one of the 2 forks will die rather > sooner than later. The versions differi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

2011-03-29 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 09:59:33 AM Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne 29.3.2011 04:12, Alexis Ballier napsal(a): > > On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:23:48 AM Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> On 03/23/2011 04:08 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > >>> Hi guys, > >>> As there is new ffmpeg fork that is a bit alive we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

2011-03-29 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 29.3.2011 04:12, Alexis Ballier napsal(a): > On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:23:48 AM Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 03/23/2011 04:08 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> As there is new ffmpeg fork that is a bit alive we should provide it as >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

2011-03-28 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:23:48 AM Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 03/23/2011 04:08 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > Hi guys, > > As there is new ffmpeg fork that is a bit alive we should provide it as > > alternative to current media-video/ffmpeg. > > > > So libav is stored in media-video/libav (lo

[gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav

2011-03-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/23/2011 04:08 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Hi guys, > As there is new ffmpeg fork that is a bit alive we should provide it as > alternative to current media-video/ffmpeg. > > So libav is stored in media-video/libav (look at it, try to find issues > and stuff). > > Virtual package is virtual/f