Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Andrey Grozin wrote:
>> It was discussed (don't have a reference to the thread at
>> hand) that it would be useful to have a table which shows which
>> functions die by themselves, and which not.
>>
>> Andrey
>>
>
> I see this asked every X months and never quite figured out
2008/12/23 Doug Goldstein :
>
> Looks like people have been truly over-zealous when removing "die"
> statements from ebuilds lately. I've added back to HAL an assortment of
> "die" statements.
>
> I hope this hasn't happened in too many other ebuilds.
>
Maybe then someone should take a look at bug
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:19:06 -0600
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Take a look for yourself and you will see why there has never been a
> "table" or anything created. (it is trivial - and you have the source
> on your computer already)
It's even trivialler than you think. If it's an external program, it
c
Andrey Grozin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Petteri R?ty wrote:
Who has been removing die statements? Is this a suggested way of action
somewhere by someone?
As recently discussed on the list, econf dies by itself, and || die
should better be removed after econf. The same is true for, e.g.,
eqma
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Petteri R?ty wrote:
Who has been removing die statements? Is this a suggested way of action
somewhere by someone?
As recently discussed on the list, econf dies by itself, and || die should
better be removed after econf. The same is true for, e.g., eqmake4. It was
discussed
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Branko Badrljica wrote:
>>
>>> Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that
>>> and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check
>>> for this kind of thing in portage ?
>>> At the very least failed c
Petteri Räty wrote:
Branko Badrljica wrote:
Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that
and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check
for this kind of thing in portage ?
At the very least failed cp should stop emerge...
Well ther
Branko Badrljica wrote:
>
> Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that
> and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check
> for this kind of thing in portage ?
> At the very least failed cp should stop emerge...
>
>
Well there isn't a single
On Monday 22 December 2008 11:40:32 pm Branko Badrljica wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
> > Branko Badrljica posted
> > 494f1518.2020...@avtomatika.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 22 Dec 2008
> >
> > 05:18:32 +0100:
> >> Maybe I should have filed this as a bug, but don't have a clue to which
> >> package sh
Duncan wrote:
> Branko Badrljica posted
> 494f1518.2020...@avtomatika.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 22 Dec 2008
> 05:18:32 +0100:
>
>
>> Maybe I should have filed this as a bug, but don't have a clue to which
>> package should I assign it, if any.
>>
>
> FWIW, this would have been a perfe
Branko Badrljica posted
494f1518.2020...@avtomatika.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 22 Dec 2008
05:18:32 +0100:
> Maybe I should have filed this as a bug, but don't have a clue to which
> package should I assign it, if any.
FWIW, this would have been a perfect question for the gentoo-desktop
lis
11 matches
Mail list logo
