On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 02:24:49PM -0800, Mike Doty wrote:
1. re-elect a whole new council.
Seems to be overkill to me.
2. elect a new member at a reduced term to fill the vacancy.
Personally i'd rather go with #3, but the GLEP also states:
If a council member who has been marked a
On Monday 29 of January 2007 12:46:33 Wernfried Haas wrote:
4. The position stays empty until the next election (As long the
number of council members doesn't drop below a certain number,
let's say 5.
I think we need odd no. of members to have a casting vote.
Btw. I vote for #3.
--
For what its worth, I think option #2 is the best.
I think option #1 is out of the question and I think that #3 is flawed
because the 8th spot developer's situation or commitment to the project may
have changed since the last vote and in any case that developer would be
free to partake in the
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:39:05 +0100
Rob C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what its worth, I think option #2 is the best.
I think option #1 is out of the question and I think that #3 is flawed
because the 8th spot developer's situation or commitment to the
project may have changed since the last
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 14:46 +, Roy Marples wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:39:05 +0100
Rob C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what its worth, I think option #2 is the best.
I think option #1 is out of the question and I think that #3 is flawed
because the 8th spot developer's situation
Ned Ludd wrote: [Mon Jan 29 2007, 09:50:28AM CST]
Then it should be offered to the 8th person, at which point either
he/she will then refuse the nomination and it's offered to the 9th.
Rinse and repeat.
If we run out of nominees then we'll need another election.
Agreed. #3
From my
On Mon, 2007-29-01 at 14:01 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote: [Mon Jan 29 2007, 09:50:28AM CST]
Then it should be offered to the 8th person, at which point either
he/she will then refuse the nomination and it's offered to the 9th.
Rinse and repeat.
If we run out of nominees
The subject of what to do if a council member voluntarily leaves the
council came up at the last meeting. The glep doesn't cover what to do
in this case.
Here are the options:
1. re-elect a whole new council.
2. elect a new member at a reduced term to fill the vacancy.
3. take the 8th spot
On Sun, 2007-28-01 at 14:24 -0800, Mike Doty wrote:
The subject of what to do if a council member voluntarily leaves the
council came up at the last meeting. The glep doesn't cover what to do
in this case.
Here are the options:
1. re-elect a whole new council.
2. elect a new member at
On Sunday 28 January 2007 17:24, Mike Doty wrote:
The subject of what to do if a council member voluntarily leaves the
council came up at the last meeting.
i dont think the voluntarily qualification should be there ... if a dev
turns jackass and they get punted and they happen to be on the
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 28 January 2007 17:24, Mike Doty wrote:
1. re-elect a whole new council.
2. elect a new member at a reduced term to fill the vacancy.
3. take the 8th spot from the last election.
i'd lean towards three here ... also, s/8th/next/ in case we shed more than 1
11 matches
Mail list logo
