Hi everyone,
I've been pushing out systemd stage3s for amd64 and x86 and putting them
under our official releases at [1] and [2]. I think all the bugs are
out and those stages are pretty tight. The next step is for me to
advertise them at [3].
So this is just a heads up. Let me know if I overl
On 07/05/16 16:09, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been pushing out systemd stage3s for amd64 and x86 and putting them
> under our official releases at [1] and [2]. I think all the bugs are
> out and those stages are pretty tight. The next step is for me to
> advertise them at [3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2016, 17:09:50 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been pushing out systemd stage3s for amd64 and x86 and putting them
> under our official releases at [1] and [2]. I think all the bugs are
> out and those stages a
On 5/7/16 1:47 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2016, 17:09:50 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
>> Hi everyone,
>
>> I've been pushing out systemd stage3s for amd64 and x86 and putting them
>> under our official releases at [1] and [2]. I think all the bugs are
>> out and those stages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2016, 19:47:55 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel:
> Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2016, 17:09:50 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I've been pushing out systemd stage3s for amd64 and x86 and putting them
> > under our official rel
On 5/7/2016 11:52 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2016, 19:47:55 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel:
Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2016, 17:09:50 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
Hi everyone,
I've been pushing out systemd stage3s for amd64 and x86 and p
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Marchese wrote:
> Looks good. Nice work, fellas.
++
>
> I'll do some testing of my own on those stage tarballs so that I can write
> some docs, unless you'd like to write them, blueness. This should ease the
> path on the systemd "Handbook extension" idea
On 5/9/16 8:43 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Marchese
> wrote:
>> Looks good. Nice work, fellas.
>
> ++
>
>>
>> I'll do some testing of my own on those stage tarballs so that I can write
>> some docs, unless you'd like to write them, blueness. This should eas
On 09/05/16 21:08, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
>> Is there actually a decent systemd-based rescue CD out there?
>>
> while i can see some merits to this, eg. running systemd-nspawn from a
> live cd, this is a lower priority. i don't have any desire to maintain
> this.
>
I rather thought this questi
On 5/9/16 4:20 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 09/05/16 21:08, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>>
>>> Is there actually a decent systemd-based rescue CD out there?
>>>
>> while i can see some merits to this, eg. running systemd-nspawn from a
>> live cd, this is a lower priority. i don't have any desire to
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Anthony G. Basile
wrote:
>
> oh okay. sorry if i misunderstood. nonetheless, doesn't the fedora
> installation cd double as a rescue cd? i think that uses systemd.
>
It might - no idea. I'm not sure if it is as loaded with useful
utilities, X11, a package manag
On 10/05/16 00:08, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Anthony G. Basile
> wrote:
>> oh okay. sorry if i misunderstood. nonetheless, doesn't the fedora
>> installation cd double as a rescue cd? i think that uses systemd.
>>
> It might - no idea. I'm not sure if it is as loade
On 09/05/16 19:12, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 10/05/16 00:08, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Anthony G. Basile
>> wrote:
>>> oh okay. sorry if i misunderstood. nonetheless, doesn't the fedora
>>> installation cd double as a rescue cd? i think that uses systemd.
>>>
>> It
13 matches
Mail list logo
