Re: [gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile?

2023-07-23 Thread Violet Purcell
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 12:11:51PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Andrey Grozin wrote: > > > OK, sbcl is masked on musl. But why clisp, ecls, or gcl cannot be used > > in the amd64 musl profile? > > > (I don't know if they actually work on amd64 musl systems, or if > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile?

2023-07-23 Thread Andrey Grozin
On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Ulrich Mueller wrote: I think what happens is this: sbcl is masked on musl, but it is the only version that is enabled in the ebuild by the IUSE="+sbcl" default. Therefore, none of the versions available on musl is enabled there, resulting in an unsatisfied REQUIRED_USE. Than

Re: [gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile?

2023-07-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > I think what happens is this: sbcl is masked on musl, but it is the only > version that is enabled in the ebuild by the IUSE="+sbcl" default. > Therefore, none of the versions available on musl is enabled there, > resulting in an unsatisfied REQUI

Re: [gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile?

2023-07-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Andrey Grozin wrote: > OK, sbcl is masked on musl. But why clisp, ecls, or gcl cannot be used > in the amd64 musl profile? > (I don't know if they actually work on amd64 musl systems, or if > anybody ever tried to do so. I just ask a formal question about Gentoo > profi

Re: [gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile?

2023-07-23 Thread Andrey Grozin
On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Ulrich Mueller wrote: $ find . -name 'use.mask' -exec grep -E '^(clisp|clozurecl|clozurecl64|cmucl|ecls|gcl|sbcl)\b' {} + ./features/musl/use.mask:sbcl ./arch/base/use.mask:clisp ./arch/base/use.mask:clozurecl ./arch/base/use.mask:cmucl ./arch/base/use.mask:ecls ./arch/base/

Re: [gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile?

2023-07-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Andrey Grozin wrote: > It seems that there are no lisps in this profile. This may be correct. > But where are all lisps masked? I see only > grozin@bilbo /home/gentoo/profiles $ find -name package.mask | xargs > fgrep lisp > ./arch/powerpc/ppc64/package.mask:dev-lisp/sb

[gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile?

2023-07-23 Thread Andrey Grozin
Hello *, grozin@bilbo /home/gentoo/sci-mathematics/maxima $ pkgcheck scan gentoo -- updating git cache: commit date: 2023-07-23 sci-mathematics/maxima UnstableOnly: for arches: [ ppc, x86 ], all versions are unstable: [ 5.46.0-r1, 5.47.0 ] PotentialStable: version 5.46.0-r1: slot(0), stabled