base.eclass: last-rite eclass (mark as @DEAD)
Removal on 2021-05-09. Please port to general eclass functions/helpers.
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/497022 for information.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
A lot of (inheriting eclasses and) packages depend on features
provided by base.eclass (e.g., PATCHES), which are pretty neat and
which I would sorely miss. So I would certainly object to deprecating
base.eclass,
On 07/08/2012 11:10 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
should each eclass make sure it
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:21:21 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
yet base.eclass supports arguments for base_src_install passed to
'make install'
and council voted against moving this to the PM
so what ciaranm said is very true, people just refuse to let it
become useless
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:39:38 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2012 08:45 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it
just an eclass like the others and ebuilds should make sure they inherit
it if
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it
just an eclass
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere,
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 22:59 +0200, René Neumann escribió:
Am 08.07.2012 22:10, schrieb Michał Górny:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere,
Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
should
15 matches
Mail list logo
