On Thursday 09 March 2006 05:28, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not
> > just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries
>
> Because of the number of `file` calls n
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 11:28 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not
> > just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries
> Because of the number of `file` calls n
On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not
> just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries
Because of the number of `file` calls needed to identify stripped and
non-stripped binaries, I'd say...
--
Diego
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 21:42, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> One alternative is to add nostrip to the restrict of those packages, so
> that prepallstrip is skipped and extra files are not created.
> That is what I've done with emul-x86-* packages and mplayer-bin, but I'm
> not 100% sure how
Okay, this is a bit anticipated by my blog post and by what I've been doing
tonight instead of sleeping :P
Basically I'm trying to get cleaned up what I have in /usr/lib/debug when
using splitdebug, getting rid of stuff that gets stripped there... mostly
it's because of errors in packages or in
