Re: [gentoo-dev] dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-15 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Albert Zeyer wrote: | Hi! [snip] | So, what do you think? I think it makes no sense to have a no-server no-gui option, so this just doesn't map cleanly to our binary use flag system. Marijn - -- Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project,

Re: [gentoo-dev] dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-15 Thread Benedikt Morbach
I think it should be made consistent or it should be turned into a local use flag. no-* or *-only flag don't make sense in my opinion, because you can get the same with: -gui instead of nogui (maybe -gtk/-qt4/-kde or something would be even better) -* server instead of server-only (sure, this can

Re: [gentoo-dev] dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-15 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 15:42 +0200, Benedikt Morbach wrote: I think it should be made consistent or it should be turned into a local use flag. no-* or *-only flag don't make sense in my opinion, because you can get the same with: -gui instead of nogui (maybe -gtk/-qt4/-kde or something would

[gentoo-dev] dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-14 Thread Albert Zeyer
Hi! Jan Kundrát said this topic belongs to the mailinglist. You can find the related bug-report here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221967 Content: From the name of the USE-flag, you could expect different things: 1. It stands for 'dedicated server', which would mean, that this