Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
> Sorry I was unclear - what I meant was that we wouldn't remove all
> support for an fs from portage. As an example if/when reiserfs4 merges
> into mainline we wouldn't be ripping out all the userland support and
> vanilla-kernel support.
We'd never do that. Seeing thing
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 09:34 -0400, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
> That said, we're not RedHat. We ship as MANY features as we can and let
> the user decide. I agree that it is valuable to get reiser4 testing done
> up front. Eventually - some people will use it. Last I checked "I think
> $FOO is stupi
Daniel Drake wrote:
>Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
>
>
>>That said, we're not RedHat. We ship as MANY features as we can and let
>>the user decide. I agree that it is valuable to get reiser4 testing done
>>up front. Eventually - some people will use it. Last I checked "I think
>>$FOO is stupid" wasn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Drake wrote:
>Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
>
>>That said, we're not RedHat. We ship as MANY features as we can and let
>>the user decide. I agree that it is valuable to get reiser4 testing done
>>up front. Eventually - some people will use it. L
Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
> That said, we're not RedHat. We ship as MANY features as we can and let
> the user decide. I agree that it is valuable to get reiser4 testing done
> up front. Eventually - some people will use it. Last I checked "I think
> $FOO is stupid" wasn't a valid closure code in b
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 02:31 -0400, Andrew Muraco wrote:
>
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> >On Saturday 18 June 2005 02:21 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Saturday 18 June 2005 01:53 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> reiser4, pie/ssp ha
Luca Barbato wrote:
>Kumba wrote:
>
>
>
>>I'm just stating this, because once reiserfs4 goes mainline (I believe
>>it's in -mm currently), we are bound to have users hitting various bumps
>>and ruts in the road using it, and if they file bugs to our bugzilla
>>that aren't related to patches we p
Andrew Muraco wrote:
>Linux-2.6.12 is officially out according to kernel.org
>I have not tried this, I'm waiting on an official announcement on
>slashdot or some other similar news site with a list of the major
>changes between 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 -- i heard that it might have
>reiser4 stock, but i
On Saturday 18 June 2005 19:27, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Given reiserfs4 is around for enough time and lots of brave users tested
> it, it MAY be not so unstable.
On Saturday 18 June 2005 02:30, E.Gryaznova wrote:
> Reiser4 format was changed in reiser4-5 patch for 2.6.11, reiser4progs
> for this fo
Kumba wrote:
> I'm just stating this, because once reiserfs4 goes mainline (I believe
> it's in -mm currently), we are bound to have users hitting various bumps
> and ruts in the road using it, and if they file bugs to our bugzilla
> that aren't related to patches we produce, then they'll likely w
Andrew Muraco wrote:
> actually i dont know if they were talking about ssp/pie but the correct
> term is
> SELinux (known to gentooers as hardened) and trusted computing are also
> things that were reported to be up for mainline kernel
> http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;669959914;fp;16;fpi
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>On Saturday 18 June 2005 02:21 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
>
>
>>Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Saturday 18 June 2005 01:53 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
>>>
>>>
reiser4, pie/ssp hardened, etc
>>>what would the mainline kernel care about ssp ?
On Saturday 18 June 2005 02:21 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >On Saturday 18 June 2005 01:53 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> >>reiser4, pie/ssp hardened, etc
> >
> >what would the mainline kernel care about ssp ?
> >-mike
>
> actually i dont know if they were talking about ssp/pie b
Andrew Muraco wrote:
keep your wity comments to yourself -lol i dont think ext3 is going
anywhere for a long time..
I usually think this is why alot of people still rely on it. It's solid, and
doesn't change very often, so people working in environments that require solid
stability on Linu
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>On Saturday 18 June 2005 01:53 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
>
>
>>reiser4, pie/ssp hardened, etc
>>
>>
>
>what would the mainline kernel care about ssp ?
>-mike
>
>
actually i dont know if they were talking about ssp/pie but the correct
term is
SELinux (known to gentoo
Kumba wrote:
> Jason Wever wrote:
>
>>
>> The ChangeLog[1] is your friend. Live it, love it, use it!
>>
>> [1] - http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.12
>
>
> Thankfully, I see no mention of reiserfs4 in it. So we may yet be
> spared another release before the post-processed
On Saturday 18 June 2005 01:53 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> reiser4, pie/ssp hardened, etc
what would the mainline kernel care about ssp ?
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Jason Wever wrote:
The ChangeLog[1] is your friend. Live it, love it, use it!
[1] - http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.12
Thankfully, I see no mention of reiserfs4 in it. So we may yet be spared
another release before the post-processed organic material hits the prov
Jason Stubbs wrote:
>On Saturday 18 June 2005 13:52, Andrew Muraco wrote:
>
>
>>Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Saturday 18 June 2005 12:22 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
>>>
>>>
Linux-2.6.12 is officially out according to kernel.org
Just an FYI for you all, and the vanilla-sourc
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:52:55 -0400
Andrew Muraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im not expecting it to be added to the tree that quickly it hasnt even
> been officially announced, i just wanted to get an idea of what it has
> to offer once the articles start poping up :-P
The ChangeLog[1] is your f
On Saturday 18 June 2005 13:52, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >On Saturday 18 June 2005 12:22 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> >>Linux-2.6.12 is officially out according to kernel.org
> >>Just an FYI for you all, and the vanilla-sources maintainers :)
> >
> >/me looks around ... nope, th
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>On Saturday 18 June 2005 12:22 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
>
>
>>Linux-2.6.12 is officially out according to kernel.org
>>Just an FYI for you all, and the vanilla-sources maintainers :)
>>
>>
>
>/me looks around ... nope, this doesnt look like bugs.gentoo.org to me ...
>-
On Saturday 18 June 2005 12:22 am, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> Linux-2.6.12 is officially out according to kernel.org
> Just an FYI for you all, and the vanilla-sources maintainers :)
/me looks around ... nope, this doesnt look like bugs.gentoo.org to me ...
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Linux-2.6.12 is officially out according to kernel.org
I have not tried this, I'm waiting on an official announcement on
slashdot or some other similar news site with a list of the major
changes between 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 -- i heard that it might have
reiser4 stock, but i can not confirm that.
Just
24 matches
Mail list logo
