* Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
Hi,
> > what problems do you see w/ licensing ?
> >
> > IMHO, each branch simply has to follow the upstream's license.
>
> i have yet to see easy cases with licensing.
> i haven't thought about it in detail yet, tough, to be honest.
well, let's just see if the fir
On 05/08/10 22:11, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> what problems do you see w/ licensing ?
>
> IMHO, each branch simply has to follow the upstream's license.
i have yet to see easy cases with licensing.
i haven't thought about it in detail yet, tough, to be honest.
> simply normalize: don't use letters
* Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
Hi,
> interesting concept. i'd like to comment on a few details:
>
> - licensing seems not be addressed, yet.
>licensing can kill everything, it needs consideration.
what problems do you see w/ licensing ?
IMHO, each branch simply has to follow the upstream'
hello enrico,
interesting concept. i'd like to comment on a few details:
- licensing seems not be addressed, yet.
licensing can kill everything, it needs consideration.
- branch and tag namespaces as currently defined have a few problems:
- versioning:
- the A.B.C.D scheme won't
hi folks,
just in case anybody's interested:
I've written a little paper on the OSS-QM project, which aims to
provide fixed sourcetrees to many packages+versions and so offload
much of the QM/patching work from individual distros to a common
place:
http://www.metux.de/download/oss-qm-project-201
