On 18:45 Wed 23 Nov , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> personally, i've never found .rej useful.
It's nice if you use dev-util/wiggle.
--
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Berkholz
Council Member / Sr. Developer
Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.com
pgptppoeNYKdB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 18:19:40 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Friday 18 of December 2009 20:07:47 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > if (patch -p${count} ${EPATCH_OPTS} --dry-run -f <
> "${PATCH_TARGET}") >>
> > "${STDERR_TARGET}" 2>&1 ; then
>
> There seems to be a little 'proble
On Friday 18 of December 2009 20:07:47 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if (patch -p${count} ${EPATCH_OPTS} --dry-run -f <
"${PATCH_TARGET}") >>
> "${STDERR_TARGET}" 2>&1 ; then
Just FYI.
There seems to be a little 'problem' with this, as patch is validated in --
dry-run mode before
> i'm guessing you havent seen any problems then
Sorry forgot to notice you, nope the tinderbox completed the run, and
restarted now, no problem at all.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - flamee...@gmail.com
Free Software developer and consultant
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Saturday 19 December 2009 07:33:33 Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 18/12/2009 alle 23.56 -0800, Brian Harring ha scritto:
> > For changes of this sort, abusing the tinderboxes to get a real world
> > test run makes a lot of sense.
>
> I can put it into run with the tinder
On 12/19/2009 04:33 AM, Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò wrote:
> But I think that we should really use both: Patrick's should be better
> for I/O so maybe you (or Zac) can come up with a script to just try
> unpack and prepare phases for all ebuilds rather than keeping the whole
> merge…
A script t
On Saturday 19 December 2009 07:33:33 Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 18/12/2009 alle 23.56 -0800, Brian Harring ha scritto:
> > For changes of this sort, abusing the tinderboxes to get a real world
> > test run makes a lot of sense.
>
> I can put it into run with the tinder
Il giorno ven, 18/12/2009 alle 23.56 -0800, Brian Harring ha scritto:
>
> For changes of this sort, abusing the tinderboxes to get a real world
> test run makes a lot of sense.
I can put it into run with the tinderbox, no problem with that.
But I think that we should really use both: Patrick's
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:06:22PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > for various reasons/limitations/bugs/whatever, i rewrote epatch. seems to
> > work for me, but in case someone wants to check before i release:
>
> Wouldn't it be safer
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> for various reasons/limitations/bugs/whatever, i rewrote epatch. seems to
> work for me, but in case someone wants to check before i release:
Wouldn't it be safer to let this run on, say, Patrick's or Deigo's
tinderboxes for a day or so b
for various reasons/limitations/bugs/whatever, i rewrote epatch. seems to
work for me, but in case someone wants to check before i release:
epatch() {
_epatch_draw_line() {
# create a line of same length as input string
[[ -z $1 ]] && set "$(printf "%65s" ''
11 matches
Mail list logo
