Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-08-01 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:29:37PM -0700, Patrick McLean wrote: On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:28:03 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:57:59PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: What I'm asking about is whether anyone knows of a smoothe way to transition users

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-08-01 Thread Patrick McLean
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 10:05:44 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:29:37PM -0700, Patrick McLean wrote: On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:28:03 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:57:59PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-31 Thread Patrick McLean
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:28:03 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:57:59PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: What I'm asking about is whether anyone knows of a smoothe way to transition users from local/netmount to mount.filesystem dependencies, without breaking

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-31 Thread William Hubbs
All, I just added another update to the mount-service branch to show where I would like this to go. OpenRC doesn't have any internal dependencies on netmount, but several on localmount. All references to localmount have been changed to mount.usr mount.var. The advantage to this setup is that we

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-31 Thread eroen
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:49:08PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: I'm still looking for ideas of ways to avoid making this a breaking change. If it isn't possible to make it a non-breaking change, this will force openrc-1.0 to be the first release where we can do this (going from 0.x to 1.x

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-31 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:27:02PM +0200, eroen wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:49:08PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: I'm still looking for ideas of ways to avoid making this a breaking change. If it isn't possible to make it a non-breaking change, this will force openrc-1.0 to be the first

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-31 Thread Peter Stuge
William Hubbs wrote: [1] http://www.semver.org Major version zero (0.y.z) is for initial development. Anything may change The problem is that version 0 hit stable Just treat version numbers as the meaningless counters they are. I can't just randomly break things from 0.17 to 0.18 for

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-31 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:57:59PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: William Hubbs wrote: [1] http://www.semver.org Major version zero (0.y.z) is for initial development. Anything may change The problem is that version 0 hit stable Just treat version numbers as the meaningless counters

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-30 Thread Alexander Hof
Patrick McLean: On what planet is fstab pure legacy? +1

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-29 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the OpenRC github repository now has a mount-service branch. Nice! But I still trying to figure out why do we need to keep fstab around. It is pure

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-29 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the OpenRC github repository now has a mount-service branch. Nice! But I still

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-29 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 30 July 2015 at 01:33, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:22:54PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, so that there is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-29 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 30 July 2015 at 01:22, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the OpenRC github

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-29 Thread Patrick McLean
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 01:11:30 +0300 Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote: On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the OpenRC github repository now has a mount-service branch. Nice!

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-29 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:22:54PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the OpenRC

[gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-29 Thread William Hubbs
All, so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the OpenRC github repository now has a mount-service branch. This is not on master for a very good reason; it is prototype material, definitely pre-alpha at this point. If you don't know how to mess with github branches,

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 30/07/2015 00:22, William Hubbs wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:11:30AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On 29 July 2015 at 23:20, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: All, so that there is a better idea out there of what I'm talking about, the OpenRC github repository now has a