On Tuesday 23 August 2005 00:38, Brian Harring wrote:
Hola all.
Short version, the nostrip feature is a bit funky as an option. What
I'm after is effectively building all packages *with* debugging
information as default, and leaving it up to the repository you're
merging the package to, to
On Tue, 2005-23-08 at 11:16 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
As an aside to this. Does anyone know how debug information can be changed
to have a different basedir. My idea was to create a custom strip
wrapper that would create external debugging files (like now possible
with gdb/binutils) and
First, sidenote (mild ot to this thread also), pardon the dupe posts,
thick fingered typing dumping an old message :)
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:34:33PM -0400, Olivier Crete wrote:
On Tue, 2005-23-08 at 11:16 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
As an aside to this. Does anyone know how debug
On Tue, 2005-23-08 at 12:40 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
First, sidenote (mild ot to this thread also), pardon the dupe posts,
thick fingered typing dumping an old message :)
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:34:33PM -0400, Olivier Crete wrote:
On Tue, 2005-23-08 at 11:16 +0200, Paul de Vrieze
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:58:46PM -0400, Olivier Crete wrote:
I havent looked at your new implementation (does it exist).. but yea
what you wrote seems to make sense... except that I keep the source code
too.. so it would bloat binary packages.. I think it should be done
before the packages
Hola all.
Short version, the nostrip feature is a bit funky as an option. What
I'm after is effectively building all packages *with* debugging
information as default, and leaving it up to the repository you're
merging the package to, to decide on stripping or not.
IOW, if you prefer stripped
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 07:38, Brian Harring wrote:
Hola all.
Short version, the nostrip feature is a bit funky as an option. What
I'm after is effectively building all packages *with* debugging
information as default, and leaving it up to the repository you're
merging the package to, to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
| On Tuesday 23 August 2005 07:38, Brian Harring wrote:
|So... thoughts? I'd be particularly curious about any package where
|this wouldn't be viable.
|
|
| I believe xorg-x11 is one such package. But then, this might just be a
|
