Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

10.07.2017 20:22, Agostino Sarubbo пишет: > Hi all. > > every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always > see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status. > Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more > effort in amd64 and

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On 07/10/2017 10:22 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hi all. > > every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always > see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status. > Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more > effort in amd64

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:20:12 +0200 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 10/07/17 20:11, Jonas Stein wrote: > > It would be so motivating to see that many user are glad about a > > special package. One gets rarely feedback. > > Interesting idea. We could have some (separate)

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:27:54 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:05 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: >> > This is why stabilisation, if not for individual package maintainers on >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

Thanks all for the 'appreciation'. I'd like to remember that I'm not going away nor I'm retiring, I will just avoid to touch stabilizations, unless the stable package is part of my interest. I'd like also to reminder that in the past I monitored the bugs via the bugzilla UI, and in the recent

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:22:20 +0200 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: >Hi all. > >every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I >always see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status. >Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put >more effort in

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Monday, July 10, 2017 1:22:20 PM EDT Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hi all. > > every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I > always see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status. > Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more >

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:27:54 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:05 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > > This is why stabilisation, if not for individual package maintainers on > > amd64, has become a joke, save for Ago's efforts, and recent efforts by > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:17:34 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 07/10/2017 10:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Savchenko > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:49:40 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > >> > >>> In the case of amd64 we

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:05 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > > I dunno where you've been lately, Rich, but for most devs, would-be > devs, and observers .. there -are- no arch teams left .. just a few Arch > devs, or arch 'people' .. Obviously. I was describing how the arch team

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On 07/10/2017 10:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> >> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:49:40 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: >> >>> In the case of amd64 we already >>> encourage individual package maintainers to stabilize their own >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On 10/07/17 20:53, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >> For what it's worth, Jack Morgan was recently getting his sparc and >> ia64 systems back up, but then decided to retire instead when he saw >> all of the discussions about dropping

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:49:40 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > >> In the case of amd64 we already >> encourage individual package maintainers to stabilize their own >> packages > > Huh? Have our rules changed? As per

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

Hi, On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:49:40 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > > > Now, since I work on these arches just to help, i.e. I don't have any > > business > > and I do non have any installation of those arches and the work

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > > For what it's worth, Jack Morgan was recently getting his sparc and > ia64 systems back up, but then decided to retire instead when he saw > all of the discussions about dropping the architectures he cares > about. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hi all. > > every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always > see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status. > Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 07:22:20PM +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hi all. > > every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always > see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status. > Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more >

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On 10/07/17 20:11, Jonas Stein wrote: > It would be so motivating to see that many user are glad about a > special package. One gets rarely feedback. Interesting idea. We could have some (separate) portage-y helper tool send a standardised email that could easily be filtered based on sender

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

Hi Agostino, at first I want to thank you for the many contributions. There should be a "thank you" parameter in emerge for every installed package. It would be so motivating to see that many user are glad about a special package. One gets rarely feedback. I understand your decision and perhaps

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > Now, since I work on these arches just to help, i.e. I don't have any business > and I do non have any installation of those arches and the work I'm doing is > not appreciated at all I decided to stop for now. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:22:20 +0200 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hi all. > > every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, > I always see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status. > Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I

[gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

Hi all. every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status. Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put more effort in amd64 and less where I saw other people work on it (arm,alpha) But