On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:58:06 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Would it be terribly difficult to set a template in the Summary
field whenever the Keywording and Stabilization component is
selected when filing a bug?
No, just very naive.
Just today I caught yet another fresh
On 03/06/2015 07:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Sven Vermeulen sw...@gentoo.org wrote:
It doesn't hurt to have a recommendation, and personally I really appreciate
when people (yes, that includes developers and wranglers ;-) update the line
to be more informative.
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:27:38 -0500
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
but if people are suffering burnout over editing the line it this
doesn't seem like the biggest value-add to me.
That didn't happen.
jer
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I'm trying to find the best fix for
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535814
Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization
request' % cpv format.
The Emacs team used to have a stabilisation template with summary
Please
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is your preference? Let's agree on something and avoid unnecessary
changes on bugzilla.
Out of curiousity, what makes the changes necessary in the first
place? It seems like an incredible amount of effort is
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 15:20:23 -0500
Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
So jer format is something like %s - foo.
Yes. I now have a format named after me.
I guess I subconsciously reverted to using a colon because that's what
makes the most sense to me. But there is a little ambiguity
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:01:23 +0100
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm trying to find the best fix for
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535814
Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization
request' % cpv format.
Here are some options I see:
a)
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:55:13AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
Out of curiousity, what makes the changes necessary in the first
place? It seems like an incredible amount of effort is going into
standardizing the format of textual summary lines and perhaps the
simplest solution is to just not
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Sven Vermeulen sw...@gentoo.org wrote:
It doesn't hurt to have a recommendation, and personally I really appreciate
when people (yes, that includes developers and wranglers ;-) update the line
to be more informative. There already is a recommendation on the
On 03/05/2015 02:01 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I'm trying to find the best fix for
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535814
Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization
request' % cpv format.
Here are some options I see:
a) keep '%s:' as is
b) change to
On 03/05/2015 03:03 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I've settled on using a colon i.e. jer format. If the bug references a
specific version (range), then I use =, =, etc. appropriately. In the
case of stabilization bugs, I'd throw in the =.
So, (c).
Crap, I flipped a bit. I remembered that
On 6 March 2015 at 09:03, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
I've settled on using a colon i.e. jer format. If the bug references a
specific version (range), then I use =, =, etc. appropriately. In the
case of stabilization bugs, I'd throw in the =.
I was under the impression adding =
On 05 Mar 2015 20:01, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I'm trying to find the best fix for
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535814
Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization
request' % cpv format.
Here are some options I see:
a) keep '%s:' as is
b) change to just
I'm trying to find the best fix for
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535814
Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization
request' % cpv format.
Here are some options I see:
a) keep '%s:' as is
b) change to just '%s'
c) change to '=%s:'
d) change to '=%s'
e) something
14 matches
Mail list logo
