On 29 March 2012 07:43, Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, we're all getting way off topic and discussing reorganizing the
whole enchilada.
How about we all agree or disagree on the primary point: The Portage
tree doesn't belong in /usr.
+1
I believe that it does belong
On 29 March 2012 08:21, Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org wrote:
'Support' is the keyword here. The repositories are regenerated given
machinesan 'emerge --sync' and can be considered as temporary as the
packages themselves are impermanent. Further, the repository isn't
required to
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2012 08:21, Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org wrote:
'Support' is the keyword here. The repositories are regenerated given
machinesan 'emerge --sync' and can be considered as temporary as the
On 03/22/2012 03:20 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
[1] For one, genkernel should bomb out if it can't comply with a
command-line arg instead of just putting non-alert text up.
There is already a bug open about this issue:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409277
With that bug fixed
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:00:17 -0400
Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
You are right. I spoke to ulm about this and the disclaimer can be
considered separate from the license. Gentoo/FreeBSD will need to
switch to BSD-2, but aside from that, there is no need for a new
license.
grep
On 03/29/2012 12:58 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 03/22/2012 03:20 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
[1] For one, genkernel should bomb out if it can't comply with a
command-line arg instead of just putting non-alert text up.
There is already a bug open about this issue:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (29 Mar 2012)
# Does not work with twitter anymore. Dead upstream
# Fails because of underlinking. Bug #379277
net-im/twittare
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
On 2012.03.28 08:46, Alex Alexander wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:05:54PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the
specific objections were.
IMO the portage directory doesn't belong under /usr at all.
[snip]
William
On 2012.03.28 20:04, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Christoph Mende ange...@gentoo.org
wrote:
I believe it's /var/lib/name. Here's what FHS says:
/var/cache is intended for cached data from applications. Such data
is
locally generated as a result of time-consuming
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:19:10PM +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I posted this issue here
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:26:22PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote
Though of course, if anybody has custom stuff in say, /usr/portage/local/
which they make by hand, nuking /usr/portage will make you *Very*
unpopular.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?full=1#book_part3_chap5
11 matches
Mail list logo
