On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in
the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have the
proper slot. Otherwise your package may pull in Qt5 while it may not
in fact support it.
This can be trouble if the
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in
the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have the
proper slot. Otherwise your package may pull in Qt5
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in
the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure
On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
So what would be the methodology of making sure a package has the proper
slot?
Obviously you would need
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
So what would be the
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:27:49 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds
in the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to
On 28 July 2012 15:43, Ralph Sennhauser s...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:27:49 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted
for qt4 and qt5 useflags as the most straightforward and least
confusing.
Indeed, the flag qt has almost disappeared from the tree. Good to know.
On 28/07/12 12:27, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted
for qt4 and qt5 useflags as the most straightforward and least
confusing.
Indeed, the flag qt has almost
Nikos Chantziaras posted on Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:07:08 +0300 as excerpted:
On 28/07/12 12:27, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org
wrote:
We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted for
qt4 and qt5 useflags as the most
On 2012.07.27 03:37, Duncan wrote:
[snip]
Not that such promises hold much credibility anyway... see the kde
promise (from Aaron S when he was president of KDE e.v. so as
credible a spokesperson as it gets) continued kde3 support as long
as there were
users. (AFAIK, at least gnome
On 07/26/2012 12:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Luca Barbato wrote:
I'd add it, it is a gpl incompatible opensource license.
No problem to add it. But IMHO the usage restriction in section 3
makes it non-free:
You may use this FDK AAC Codec software or modifications
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 07/26/2012 12:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Indeed, and this opens another can of worms since (as far as I can see)
there
are no specific license clauses in the AAC patent license for applications
that may be distributed without cost. I.e.,
Roy Bamford posted on Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:51:47 +0100 as excerpted:
You don't want to listen to Presidents too much. Look at other real
life examples.
Would you claim that the President of the Gentoo Foundation speaks for
Gentoo?
If he were making claims of that nature, yes, barring
Duncan wrote:
the responsibility of whatever organization to either follow
thru or repudiate, as it's the reputation and credibility of
that organization on the line if they don't.
I think it's unreasonable to expect any third party to accept
responsibility for a receiver which is
15 matches
Mail list logo
