Hello,
We currently have values like the following:
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19
PHP_TARGETS=php5-3
PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7
I find it confusing, and I would like to propose to keep the same style for all
the above values. I personally prefer the ruby one.
Keep in mind that if the relevant teams decide
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:30:07 +0100
Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
We currently have values like the following:
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19
PHP_TARGETS=php5-3
PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7
I find it confusing, and I would like to propose to keep the same style for
all
the
On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 15:30 +0100, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Hello,
We currently have values like the following:
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19
PHP_TARGETS=php5-3
PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7
I find it confusing, and I would like to propose to keep the same style for
all
the above values. I
On 24/11/2012 07:46, Brian Dolbec wrote:
For ruby19, split in the middle to get 1.9, but what about 110, is it
11.0 or 1.10.
Okay stop.
There's no 1.10.
There's 2.0 that's being developed for a long time.
And we're not going to change our scheme just because of some
theoretical corner
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 24/11/2012 07:46, Brian Dolbec wrote:
For ruby19, split in the middle to get 1.9, but what about 110, is it
11.0 or 1.10.
Okay stop.
There's no 1.10.
There's 2.0 that's being developed for a long time.
And we're not going to change our scheme just
On 24/11/2012 10:19, Peter Stuge wrote:
Diego, remember the original point. It is obvious that a common
syntax is more coherent and thus easier for the world to understand.
Having that would be a good thing. It is also obvious that the ruby
syntax is problematic in the general case.
And the
24.11.12 19:19, Peter Stuge написав(ла):
Look at the following:
PHP_TARGETS=php5-3
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19
PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7
Note the redundancy, which I'm not quite sure why we have at all..
Why not also eliminate the language name in one of the two places;
either in the variable
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 24/11/2012 10:19, Peter Stuge wrote:
Diego, remember the original point. It is obvious that a common
syntax is more coherent and thus easier for the world to understand.
Having that would be a good thing. It
On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 08:07 -0800, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 24/11/2012 07:46, Brian Dolbec wrote:
For ruby19, split in the middle to get 1.9, but what about 110, is it
11.0 or 1.10.
Okay stop.
There's no 1.10.
There's 2.0 that's being developed for a long time.
And we're
On 24/11/2012 10:40, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
What will you do with PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 python3_2 pypy1_9
jython2_5 then?
That's another good point. And since Ruby has been brought up before,
let's not forget that we're not really slotting just for the sake of it
most of the time.
JRuby
Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
PHP_TARGETS=5.3 5.4
RUBY_TARGETS=1.9
PYTHON_TARGETS=2.7
But maybe it would be too problematic?
What will you do with PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 python3_2 pypy1_9
jython2_5 then?
That's an excellent point. Thanks!
Thinking out loud another round: _TARGETS is
Peter Stuge wrote:
Thinking out loud another round: _TARGETS is an interface by Gentoo,
so maybe it would not be such a bad idea to use existing Gentoo
identifiers there, ie. (a subset of?) PMS version specifications.
Including the package name. This would also make the UX change
smaller, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/11/12 19:46, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 24/11/2012 10:19, Peter Stuge wrote:
Diego, remember the original point. It is obvious that a
common syntax is more
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (24 Nov 2012)
# Violates java packaging policy (#168867), no release since
# 2006, it would require jdic in the tree but that needs huge
# work to be done and someone wanting to do that.
# Removal in a month.
net-proxy/paros
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (24 Nov
The percentage of bogosity is nicely small, but there are a couple in
there which shouldn't be dropped.
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (24 Nov 2012)
# Lots of bug report, use version from science overlay as pointed
# in bug #339364#c3 . Removal in a month
sci-mathematics/scilab
The version
Peter Stuge posted on Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:20:27 +0100 as excerpted:
Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
PHP_TARGETS=5.3 5.4
RUBY_TARGETS=1.9
PYTHON_TARGETS=2.7
But maybe it would be too problematic?
What will you do with PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 python3_2 pypy1_9
jython2_5 then?
That's an
On 11/23/12 21:17, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:45:56 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/20/12 21:57, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:10:51 + (UTC)
Patrick Lauer (patrick) patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
patrick 12/11/16 09:10:51
On 11/23/12 22:32, Thomas Sachau wrote:
Ian Stakenvicius schrieb:
On 22/11/12 11:22 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:22:10PM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 11:11 Sun 18 Nov , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Here's a list of every package where I'm a maintainer and there
El sáb, 24-11-2012 a las 18:47 -0500, James Cloos escribió:
The percentage of bogosity is nicely small, but there are a couple in
there which shouldn't be dropped.
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (24 Nov 2012)
# Lots of bug report, use version from science overlay as pointed
# in bug
El dom, 25-11-2012 a las 08:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
[...]
Much worse, however, is this insanity:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (24 Nov 2012)
# Fail to start due missing fonts (bugs 395353, 402713, 429234).
# Removal in a month.
x11-misc/bbdate
x11-misc/bbweather
20 matches
Mail list logo
