The 24/11/12, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
No. Being consistently stupid is not a good reason to be consistent.
Stop being fallacious, please.
And since as I said the RUBY_TARGETS interface is designed to be _usable
by Ruby developers_, being consistent and breaking that, is not
something I
On 11/26/2012 12:40 AM, Denis M. (Phr33d0m) wrote:
Hello, I'd have to mention, as HexChat is a fork from XChat it strictly
depends on gtk+-2 as well. So removing gtk+-2* will make HexChat
unusuable (at least the GUI). Also there are no plans on porting it to
anything like gtk+-3 (or Qt (I have
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as
I
lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
I also planned to release a news through the portage
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
I also planned to
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 05:07:53 -0500
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
xchat hexchat are different packages. It's a bit like pretending that
the discontinuation and fork didn't ever happen, and the packages are
equivalent (which they are not, as have been already pointed out).
they're about as equivalent as
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
So, users will just suddenly have their binary change names, and will
need to manually move config files and update logrotate.d files (if in
use), and the only
I'd like to retire from these sometime soon:
dev-lua/lua-zlib: no other maintainers/herd
dev-lua/luadbi: no other maintainers/herd
dev-lua/luaevent: blueness, rafaelmartins
dev-lua/luaexpat: rafaelmartins
dev-lua/luasec: rafaelmartins
net-im/prosody: klausman, rafaelmartins
AFAICT Rafael isn't
On 11/26/2012 01:16 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
So, users will just suddenly have their binary change names, and will
need to manually move config files and
On 26/11/2012 00:20, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The request is for Gentoo administration. So, talking about developers
of a language is not the question.
Gentoo administration? What on earth would that be?
I am a ruby developer and having ruby18 or ruby_1_8 is not much a
problem. There are a
On 04:22 Fri 23 Nov , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:22:10PM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 11:11 Sun 18 Nov , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Here's a list of every package where I'm a maintainer and there is no
herd listed (but their might be other maintainers):
I
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'd like to retire from these sometime soon:
dev-lua/lua-zlib: no other maintainers/herd
dev-lua/luadbi: no other maintainers/herd
dev-lua/luaevent: blueness, rafaelmartins
dev-lua/luaexpat: rafaelmartins
Swegener recently moved away from the following packages:
app-admin/eselect-pinentry
app-crypt/pinentry
Thanks for taking care of them if you want
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:33:15AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote
the inability to make users read the package.mask message explaining
the situation is the only valid point in your e-mail.
along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
Howsabout following the same procedure
On 26/11/2012 10:17, Walter Dnes wrote:
Howsabout following the same procedure as when xpdf was dropped? I
vaguely remember emerge --update --deep world stopping with a message
that xpdf was being dropped, and also a few alternatives were suggested
in the message.
That's the p.maks
El lun, 26-11-2012 a las 18:58 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
Swegener recently moved away from the following packages:
app-admin/eselect-pinentry
app-crypt/pinentry
Thanks for taking care of them if you want
And:
net-dns/avahi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On 11/26/2012 01:52 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 26-11-2012 a las 18:58 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
Swegener recently moved away from the following packages:
app-admin/eselect-pinentry
app-crypt/pinentry
Thanks for taking care of them if you want
And:
net-dns/avahi
This one is interesting
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
I haven't heard back from them, maybe you can ask them what's up.
This has been setup (with Donnie's help):
https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo
I've claimed 15 of the projects on there that I could easily find,
analysis on
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:17:13 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Maybe. On the other hand, the udev-systemd switch was performed
upstream which makes it a valid candidate for package move.
No, it's not a valid candidate for a package move if the destination
package already exists. A
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
So, users will just move config in an elog? Oh, and they don't even use.
see what happens when you delete context ? it
On 26.11.2012 21:58, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
I haven't heard back from them, maybe you can ask them what's up.
This has been setup (with Donnie's help):
https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo
I've claimed 15 of the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:58:32PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo
I'm not a dev, and I haven't really been following this thread, but
all the other organization summaries start out with something like
Organization X is …
not
In order to sustain the current
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:30 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:58:32PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo
I'm not a dev, and I haven't really been following this thread, but
all the other organization summaries start out with
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Yeah, that was my thought as well. The text was lifted from our
charter, which was apparently written from a problem/solution
standpoint rather than something that would be less time-bound. It
doesn't really make sense
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:52:46AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Debian / Ubuntu have a tool that basically does this. Its
update-initramfs. I believe it is called from..the postinst of
packages that are supposed to be
26 matches
Mail list logo
