On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
My understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver Gentoo team
only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream) support. The
Kernels 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so they are also not
supported in
On 2 March 2013 15:57, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 02/03/2013 07:54, Ben de Groot wrote:
1. Get Qt5 ready for inclusion in the tree. This includes writing and
improving ebuilds and eclasses, testing to build those, filing bug reports
on failure, finding fixes for those
On 2 March 2013 20:26, Jauhien Piatlicki jpiatli...@gmail.com wrote:
02.03.13 07:54, Ben de Groot написав(ла):
app-admin/keepassx
app-text/goldendict
If these two packages need a maintainer, I could proxy-maintain them.
I'm not a developer, but I have some experience with ebuild writing.
On 2 March 2013 20:33, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02/03/13 08:54, Ben de Groot wrote:
The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!
sci-calculators/qalculator
This project died after the first betas. I propose treecleaning it. We have
plenty of more maintained calculators in
On Mar 3, 2013 2:42 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Markos Chandras wrote:
it just feels strange
I hear they call it getting stuff done..
//Peter
good thing you are not a dev then.
Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 00:02:30 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
With the introduction of support for x32 ABI it has become necessary
to enhance the multilib-build eclass with some kind of support for
specifying the supported/unsupported ABIs.
In this particular context,
If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into
testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users
could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to ignore
the rules to really fix stable, but was this such case for sure?
Dne 3.3.2013 3:43
Markos Chandras wrote:
it just feels strange
I hear they call it getting stuff done..
good thing you are not a dev then.
Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
I explain to you what happened and you, a recruiter, proceed to
threaten me in case I want to become a
On 3 March 2013 12:01, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Markos Chandras wrote:
it just feels strange
I hear they call it getting stuff done..
good thing you are not a dev then.
Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
I explain to you what happened
getting stuff
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:41:07 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'd prefer the useflag names for the sake of unicity, but I'm not sure
I understand why and how multilib-portage needs it.
Well, I mostly thought that if we were to introduce that information,
multilib-portage could
Markos Chandras wrote:
I explain to you what happened
getting stuff done is not an answer. I still don't understand why
stable keywords had to be added directly. Do you understand why Mike
did that or just playing smart here?
To me it's obvious that he did it because it made something
Michał Górny schrieb:
Hello,
With the introduction of support for x32 ABI it has become necessary to
enhance the multilib-build eclass with some kind of support for
specifying the supported/unsupported ABIs.
In this particular context, tetromino has noted that many packages
don't support
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
To me it's obvious that he did it because it made something easier
for him. By breaking the Gentoo rule he got something done.
Rules exist for a reason. If we're bending them because we're
accomplishing the goal of the rules in
On 03/03/2013 08:11 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
There was a big ole' chat on #gentoo-dev regarding this. My
understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver Gentoo team
only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream) support. The
Kernels 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so they
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the eclass has per-ABI header
I think this is needed.
and binaries support,
but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
why having multi binaries support would be useful.
Alexis.
On 3 March 2013 12:38, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Markos Chandras wrote:
I explain to you what happened
getting stuff done is not an answer. I still don't understand why
stable keywords had to be added directly. Do you understand why Mike
did that or just playing smart here?
To me
After talking with Caster. Feel free to get it
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the eclass has per-ABI header
I think this is needed.
and binaries support,
but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
why having multi binaries support
After talking with serkan the following packages are now up for grabs:
x11-libs/gtkhotkey
gnome-extra/file-browser-applet
app-mobilephone/ganyremote
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:42 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
add a unsupported-kernels useflag, mask it, add a clear statement in
the masking reason and be done
Not a bad solution, still, I, as a user, don't think making the compilation
work
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
and binaries support,
but here, could you enlighten me on its use cases ? I can't imagine
why having multi binaries support would be useful.
One example is glxinfo from the mesa-progs package, it will display the
information for the ABI it is compiled with. So if you
As wschlich no longer has enough time for that packages, this herd is
now empty. If you want to help, please join the herd. If nobody joins, I
will proceed with dropping it and moving its packages maintainer-needed
letting everybody want the packages they prefer.
Thanks
signature.asc
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the eclass has per-ABI header
I think this is needed.
and binaries support,
but here, could you
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:00:57 +0100
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
As wschlich no longer has enough time for that packages, this herd is
now empty. If you want to help, please join the herd. If nobody
joins, I will proceed with dropping it and moving its packages
maintainer-needed letting
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Carlos Silva r3...@r3pek.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:42 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
add a unsupported-kernels useflag, mask it, add a clear statement in
the masking reason and be done
Not a bad
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the eclass has per-ABI header
I think this is needed.
and binaries support,
but
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once the
Hey again!
Some of the packages I offered for grabs have been taken
a while ago, thanks everyone. Here are the remaining ones:
* Wolfram Schlich wschl...@gentoo.org [2012-12-01 11:02]:
[...]
Feel free to take care of the following packages that I used to
maintain a while ago but don't anymore
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
add a unsupported-kernels useflag, mask it, add a clear statement in
the masking reason and be done
If the description of the flag
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
I do not find their stance wholly unreasonable. They offered to point
users at an overlay, if someone was willing to maintain the patches
there (in lieu of user_patches.) The end result is that if users apply
the patches,
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
I do not find their stance wholly unreasonable. They offered to point
users at an overlay, if someone was willing to maintain the patches
there
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:00:57 +0100
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
As wschlich no longer has enough time for that packages, this herd is
now empty. If you want to help, please join the herd. If nobody
joins, I will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer
and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these
packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case one of the maintainers
goes MIA so we can find an alternative
Ryan Hill schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
USE=vanilla already controls conditional patching for around two dozen
packages.
add a unsupported-kernels
One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to
scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering,
gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I am
doing with my involvement in x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers. As a result
someone will need to work
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:27:50 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:47:43 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alexis Ballier schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:02:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 21:00:19 +0200
Pavlos Ratis daster...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am interested in joining the herd. Now we can be 2 members. :)
Added us both to the net-proxy herd and mail alias.
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG
El dom, 03-03-2013 a las 22:42 +0100, Tom Wijsman escribió:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 21:00:19 +0200
Pavlos Ratis daster...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am interested in joining the herd. Now we can be 2 members. :)
Added us both to the net-proxy herd and mail alias.
With kind regards,
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2013 06:24 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
That simply diverges from reality.
#
Am Sonntag, 3. März 2013, 15:39:16 schrieb Doug Goldstein:
One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to
scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering,
gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I am
doing with my involvement in
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to
scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering,
gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I am
doing with my
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:18:12 +0100
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:58:26 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do we need that wrapper for? What does the wrapper do? Does it
just rely on custom 'ABI' variable?
yes -- it must perform some checks
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:05:28 +0100
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2013 06:24 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
Not for
On 03/03/13 09:11, Alec Warner wrote:
[...] My understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver
Gentoo team only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream)
support. The Kernels 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so they
are also not supported in Gentoo. [...] There is a fear as
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2013-03-03 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-libs/libutp 2013-02-28 10:31:02 ssuominen
dev-perl/Net-Server 2013-03-02 04:10:48 zx2c4
Markos Chandras wrote:
getting stuff done is not an answer.
it made something easier for him
I asked why he did it, and you keep telling me because he had to.
I'm guessing that it didn't have much to do with Gentoo. Maybe he'll
fill in.
I am reviewing commits from time to time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2013 12:24 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
What do we have useflags for in gentoo?
Not for conditional patching, that's for sure.
add a unsupported-kernels useflag, mask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2013 04:39 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to
scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering,
gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I am
Hi all.
Since I'm running the tinderbox for Boost 1.52 on stable, and I was
looking into adding sub-slot support to my own packages, I noticed that
the three C++ TR1 virtuals are almost completely unused. The only user
is wvstreams, and only for one of them (functional).
I'm talking about:
50 matches
Mail list logo
