On 3 May 2013 12:09, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by
packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one package where the
Makefile was being patched to remove -g from CXXFLAGS but -Werror on the same
line was
On 03.05.2013 10:06, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 3 May 2013 12:09, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by
packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one package where the
Makefile was being patched to remove -g from
On 3 May 2013 16:36, Kacper Kowalik xarthis...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03.05.2013 10:06, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 3 May 2013 12:09, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by
packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one
Am 24.04.2013 11:51, schrieb René Neumann:
As more and more packages seem to (mis)use USE_EXPAND: Can we get the
possibility to set this directly in package.use? Having to write
'claws_mail_plugins_foo' does not help readability, and setting it in
make.conf is also not the right way (as is
On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:06:01 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally I've always thought -Werror is a mistake in release code,
but was accepted practice. I've almost never actively removed it from
packages I maintain. That will change now, upon learning of this
policy.
Debian
On 05/03/2013 09:46 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:06:01 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally I've always thought -Werror is a mistake in release code,
but was accepted practice. I've almost never actively removed it from
packages I maintain. That will
On 05/03/2013 03:46 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:06:01 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally I've always thought -Werror is a mistake in release code,
but was accepted practice. I've almost never actively removed it from
packages I maintain. That will
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:15 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't need that. We already get QA warnings for severe compiler
warnings with a note that it should be reported upstream.
Turning them into errors does not improve anything.
Yup - you can't really compare Gentoo build
On Fri, 03 May 2013 16:15:35 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't need that.
I was actually firmly agreeing on that point. The question was where
this was all coming from, and I was pointing out that it's regarded as
inherently good elsewhere.
We already get QA warnings for
Let's assume that all libtool files have a consistent format and contain
a line stating 'shouldnotlink=(yes|no)'. We use that to distinguish
modules from libraries, so we can as well use it to validate the .la
file to avoid removing non-libtool .la files.
This should also make the big 'if' a bit
Hi all,
I would like to have your opinion- is there any valid reason that a keyword
request for a rather central package remains completely unanswered by some
arches for 10 months?
Cheers,
Andreas
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Betreff: [Bug 428356] Please (re-)keyword
On 03/05/13 20:33, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote:
jlec13/05/03 17:33:56
Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog
Added:id3lib-3.8.3-r9.ebuild
Log:
media-libs/id3lib: Fix obsolete macros to work with automake-1.13, #467704;
bumped to EAPI=5 and
On 03/05/13 20:56, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 03/05/13 20:33, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote:
jlec13/05/03 17:33:56
Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog
Added:id3lib-3.8.3-r9.ebuild
Log:
media-libs/id3lib: Fix obsolete macros to work with automake-1.13,
On 03/05/13 19:56, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 03/05/13 20:33, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote:
jlec13/05/03 17:33:56
Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog
Added:id3lib-3.8.3-r9.ebuild
Log:
media-libs/id3lib: Fix obsolete macros to work with
On 05/03/2013 05:59 AM, René Neumann wrote:
Am 24.04.2013 11:51, schrieb René Neumann:
As more and more packages seem to (mis)use USE_EXPAND: Can we get the
possibility to set this directly in package.use? Having to write
'claws_mail_plugins_foo' does not help readability, and setting it in
Dne Pá 3. května 2013 10:39:29, Rich Freeman napsal(a):
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:15 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't need that. We already get QA warnings for severe compiler
warnings with a note that it should be reported upstream.
Turning them into errors does not
On Fri, 03 May 2013 13:20:15 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Note that PMS says USE_EXPAND variables are supposed to be treated as
incremental.
PMS says nothing about user configuration.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Am 03.05.2013 22:20, schrieb Zac Medico:
Is it worth changing?
Nope. What's worth changing is the excessive use of USE_EXPAND for no
reason (your described usecase makes sense for reasonable USE_EXPAND
stuff like VIDEO_CARDS). But seems like I'm the only one concerned by
this, so I should
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:08 PM, René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Am 03.05.2013 22:20, schrieb Zac Medico:
Is it worth changing?
Nope. What's worth changing is the excessive use of USE_EXPAND for no
reason (your described usecase makes sense for reasonable USE_EXPAND
stuff like
On Fri, 3 May 2013 15:46:41 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:06:01 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally I've always thought -Werror is a mistake in release code,
but was accepted practice. I've almost never actively removed it from
On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:41:33 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 03 May 2013 16:15:35 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
We already get QA warnings for severe compiler
warnings with a note that it should be reported upstream.
But not all of them.
I'm not sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2013 04:20 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 05/03/2013 05:59 AM, Ren￩ Neumann wrote:
Am 24.04.2013 11:51, schrieb Ren￩ Neumann:
As more and more packages seem to (mis)use USE_EXPAND: Can we get the
possibility to set this directly in package.use?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2013 05:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:08 PM, René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Am 03.05.2013 22:20, schrieb Zac Medico:
Is it worth changing?
Nope. What's worth changing is the excessive use of USE_EXPAND for no
23 matches
Mail list logo
