-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/11/13 12:22 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
For some context of this please see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/88222
v8-3.20.17.7 fixes a memory corruption vulnerability, see
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm still a little concerned about the potential security issues
caused by embedded V8's in projects, but as we've already concluded in
that other thread, there's no other way until the API stabilizes..
Yup. When a
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.orgwrote:
Problem #1 is that sci-geosciences/osgearth-2.4 depends on
=dev-lang/v8-3.18.5.14 (see
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484786 for context). It
doesn't work with more recent v8, but it can be made to not
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Problem #1 is that sci-geosciences/osgearth-2.4 depends on
=dev-lang/v8-3.18.5.14 (see
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484786 for context). It
doesn't work with more recent v8, but it can be made to not depend on v8.
If made not to depend means bundle,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/08/2013 04:18 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org mailto:phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Problem #1 is that sci-geosciences/osgearth-2.4 depends on
=dev-lang/v8-3.18.5.14
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:28:13PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree with this sentiment. It's always been my view that the needs of
a package are driven by the package itself, not by the tree.
Rationale: A
Hi,
I see nobody seems to take care of nagios packages anymore.
There are numerous bugs (and many of them are pending version bumps).
Is the sysadmin@ herd still interested in this package? If not, could
you please consider moving it to maintainer-needed@? Maybe users are
interested in working
On 11/8/2013 7:14 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
Hi,
I see nobody seems to take care of nagios packages anymore.
There are numerous bugs (and many of them are pending version bumps).
Is the sysadmin@ herd still interested in this package? If not, could
you please consider moving it to
On 8 November 2013 08:55, Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le jeudi 07 novembre 2013 à 10:44 +0100, Alexis Ballier a écrit :
in short: if a package requires version X then the ebuild should require
version X; it can be forgotten but it's a bug.
That _is_ our policy.
Since this thread was
Is anyone interested in maintaining poedit? It's currently covered by
wxwidgets and I check in on it a couple times a year for bumps/stabilization,
but I don't use it myself. Feel free to add yourself or take it over if you're
interested.
Thanks.
--
Ryan Hillpsn:
Johann Schmitz er...@gentoo.org writes:
Is it possible to run, say, mips on xen/whatever through some
emulation layer or is real hardware a requirement for this archs?
Yes, via qemu. But very slow, nearly unusable even on a powerful
mainstream amd64 server.
11 matches
Mail list logo
