Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu 27 Mar 2014 00:41:47 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 22:41 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wed 26 Mar 2014 12:23:53 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 26/03/14 12:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: that's bs. people install crossdev to get a cross-compile environment, not

Re: [gentoo-dev] crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed 26 Mar 2014 01:17:14 Mike Frysinger wrote: (2) use tuples with loaded vendor fields to reduce the chance of collisions. e.g. having an ABI=amd64 system use i686-gentoo%multilib-linux-gnu instead of i686-pc-linux-gnu would defeat any automatic path searches. this patch keeps the status

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 02:07 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: An amd64 multilib system *is* expected to build x86 binaries that would be hosted on itself. So i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar is expected to be not a part of any cross-compile toolchain, but a part of the native toolchain for the machine's

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu 27 Mar 2014 02:31:01 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 02:07 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: An amd64 multilib system *is* expected to build x86 binaries that would be hosted on itself. So i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar is expected to be not a part of any cross-compile

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 02:41:21 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Thu 27 Mar 2014 02:31:01 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 02:07 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: An amd64 multilib system *is* expected to build x86 binaries that would be hosted on itself.

Re: [gentoo-dev] crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 02:13:52 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Wed 26 Mar 2014 01:17:14 Mike Frysinger wrote: (2) use tuples with loaded vendor fields to reduce the chance of collisions. e.g. having an ABI=amd64 system use i686-gentoo%multilib-linux-gnu instead of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 27/03/14 08:41, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thu 27 Mar 2014 02:31:01 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 02:07 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: An amd64 multilib system *is* expected to build x86 binaries that would be hosted on itself. So i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar is expected to be not

Re: [gentoo-dev] crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu 27 Mar 2014 07:51:32 Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 02:13:52 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): On Wed 26 Mar 2014 01:17:14 Mike Frysinger wrote: (2) use tuples with loaded vendor fields to reduce the chance of collisions. e.g. having an ABI=amd64 system use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
really have no idea what you're ranting about. doesn't look discussion worthy though. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] ImageMagick[opencl] sandbox access violations

2014-03-27 Thread Maxim Koltsov
Hello, Currently there are four open bugs (see comment 2 in bug 490457) about imagemagick tools causing access violations while trying to open GPU. There is working solution:

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Steven J. Long
Mike Frysinger wrote: Steven J. Long wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: if they're in $PATH, then the exact location is irrelevant. they need not be in /usr/bin to cause a problem. if they're not in $PATH, then you're breaking the cross-compilers and that is unacceptable.

Re: [gentoo-dev] ImageMagick[opencl] sandbox access violations

2014-03-27 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
There's a sandbox.d configuration directory on purpose; imagemagick[opencl] should probably install its own exception. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On 27 March 2014 07:29, Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, Currently there

Re: [gentoo-dev] ImageMagick[opencl] sandbox access violations

2014-03-27 Thread Samuli Suominen
btw, this is http://bugs.gentoo.org/472766 i'll look into adding a sandbox.d file... On 27/03/14 10:54, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: There's a sandbox.d configuration directory on purpose; imagemagick[opencl] should probably install its own exception. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes

Re: [gentoo-dev] crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 03:18:31 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Thu 27 Mar 2014 07:51:32 Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 02:13:52 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): On Wed 26 Mar 2014 01:17:14 Mike Frysinger wrote: (2) use tuples with loaded vendor fields to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-03-27 Thread Alexander Hof
Pacho Ramos dixit: Due to nirbheek's lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: x11-themes/gtk-engines-murrine I'm using it, but don't know how to maintain a package yet. Just letting you know, before you have to throw it out of the tree, I'll take it. Greetings, Alex

Re: [gentoo-dev] ImageMagick[opencl] sandbox access violations

2014-03-27 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Hello, Currently there are four open bugs (see comment 2 in bug 490457) about imagemagick tools causing access violations while trying to open GPU. There is working solution: http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/x11-themes/tango-ico

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild?

2014-03-27 Thread Steven J. Long
Tom Wijsman wrote: If we were to take this example to its extreme; then we would have to create an inventory of which INSTALL_MASK entries are good and bad for each ebuild, in which we cover all the files installed by that ebuild. Why are you directing this at me? Please don't cc me off-list.

Re: [gentoo-dev] crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 10:23:30 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Thu 27 Mar 2014 10:10:07 Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 03:18:31 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): On Thu 27 Mar 2014 07:51:32 Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 02:13:52 Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] crossdev and multilib interference

2014-03-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu 27 Mar 2014 10:10:07 Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 03:18:31 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): On Thu 27 Mar 2014 07:51:32 Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-03-27, o godz. 02:13:52 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): On Wed 26 Mar 2014 01:17:14 Mike Frysinger wrote: (2) use tuples

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild?

2014-03-27 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:43:24 + Steven J. Long wrote: Tom Wijsman wrote: It's evidently meant for a few packages which would break, to avoid obvious breakage, and not as a blanket mechanism. Yes, it is; but a package consists of multiple ebuilds, and thus, the individual files of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-03-27 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:46:11 +0100 Alexander Hof gentoo...@cosmofox.net wrote: Pacho Ramos dixit: Due to nirbheek's lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: x11-themes/gtk-engines-murrine I'm using it, but don't know how to maintain a package yet. Just letting you

[gentoo-dev] RFC: small update for check-reqs.eclass

2014-03-27 Thread Ulrich Mueller
The current test for MERGE_TYPE in check-reqs_pkg_setup suppresses also the CHECKREQS_DISK_{USR,VAR} checks which are relevant for binary installs. Move the test to check-reqs_run(). Also, don't check install disk space requirements if building a binpkg without installing it. ---

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: Skip atoms that are None (bug 505944)

2014-03-27 Thread Alexander Berntsen
Don't try to display atoms that are None when in debug mode. --- Can I get an ACK on this please? Do share your ideas for refactoring, if any. But even if this is not how we want it to work in the end, I still think we should commit it to fix the bug. pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 13 +++--

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Let's standardise commit messages

2014-03-27 Thread Alexander Berntsen
The first two patches here are not interesting. The first one makes DEVELOPING cap at the same width as README. The second adds a duh paragraph on commits. They are only bundled with what I really wanna talk about because I need ACKs to push them anyway. (Please ACK them, someone.) So what I

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/3] DEVELOPING: Cap at 72 columns

2014-03-27 Thread Alexander Berntsen
--- Nothing to see here, move along. DEVELOPING | 71 +- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/DEVELOPING b/DEVELOPING index 40b4ca2..1f5087a 100644 --- a/DEVELOPING +++ b/DEVELOPING @@ -1,37 +1,39 @@ Code

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 3/3] DEVELOPING: Add note on commit messages

2014-03-27 Thread Alexander Berntsen
--- DEVELOPING | 20 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/DEVELOPING b/DEVELOPING index c6004ec..a34dda5 100644 --- a/DEVELOPING +++ b/DEVELOPING @@ -175,6 +175,26 @@ change a lot of unrelated things. This makes it easier to see what parts of the system have

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 3/3] DEVELOPING: Add note on commit messages

2014-03-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:48:40 +0100 Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote: --- DEVELOPING | 20 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/DEVELOPING b/DEVELOPING index c6004ec..a34dda5 100644 --- a/DEVELOPING +++ b/DEVELOPING @@ -175,6 +175,26 @@ change a

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/3] DEVELOPING: Cap at 72 columns

2014-03-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:48:38 +0100 Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote: --- Nothing to see here, move along. do it. -- Brian Dolbec dolsen

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/3] DEVELOPING: Add note on commits

2014-03-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:48:39 +0100 Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote: --- Boilerplate text, nothing to see here either. DEVELOPING | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/DEVELOPING b/DEVELOPING index 1f5087a..c6004ec 100644 --- a/DEVELOPING +++