Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Excuse the top posting. You don't need to strip the HTML. Change the extension to whatever.log and it's already there in unmangled text. On 2 Nov 2014 01:10, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/11/14 03:53 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 01-11-2014 a las 21:10 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió: [...] Not at the moment ; I'm going to want to do a fair bit of cleanup before i let anyone else's eyes on it.. :) It's just a bash script, though -- i use 'pybugz search' to get a list of the bugs Diego's filed (using --offset

[gentoo-dev] scheme herd needs your help (or maybe be dissolved?)

2014-11-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
I have hit this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465348 that is present for really a long time, apart of that is the guile:2 migration that never ends and still blocks aisleriot from being unmasked, and also many other bug reports assigned to them. I am not sure if anyone would be

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
How do you strip the html code? I was unsure about to do that :/ You should have asked. There is no need to strip. I upload both HTML and text alike.

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 02-11-2014 a las 13:07 +, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: How do you strip the html code? I was unsure about to do that :/ You should have asked. There is no need to strip. I upload both HTML and text alike. Ah, ok. Anyway, if AxS can tell me how was doing that would be

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-02 Thread Luca Barbato
On 02/11/14 14:22, Pacho Ramos wrote: El dom, 02-11-2014 a las 13:07 +, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: How do you strip the html code? I was unsure about to do that :/ You should have asked. There is no need to strip. I upload both HTML and text alike. Ah, ok. Anyway, if AxS can tell

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-02 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/11/14 09:44 AM, Luca Barbato wrote: On 02/11/14 14:22, Pacho Ramos wrote: El dom, 02-11-2014 a las 13:07 +, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: How do you strip the html code? I was unsure about to do that :/ You should have asked.

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-02 Thread hasufell
On 11/02/2014 03:08 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: Well, nothing is ever ideal, but as issues come up they are being dealt with now. I can't think of any situations where somebody has been able to block out new contributors in the last year or two. Sure, there have been a few attempts, but we've

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unifying the PostgreSQL Ebuilds

2014-11-02 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
On 2014-10-11 18:02, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: On 2014-09-19 10:11, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: I'm hoping to press forward with this change in the next week or so. Thank you in advance! [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505540 [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456876

[gentoo-dev] typo in scrypt USE-Flag

2014-11-02 Thread Marco Ziebell
There's a typo in the scrypt USE-FLAG. A bug-report seemed to big for that. Correct would be scrypt: Use libscrypt for the scrypt algorithm Found here: # equery u tor [ Legend : U - final flag setting for installation] [: I - package is installed with flag ] [ Colors : set, unset

Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in scrypt USE-Flag

2014-11-02 Thread Alex Xu
On 02/11/14 11:41 AM, Marco Ziebell wrote: There's a typo in the scrypt USE-FLAG. A bug-report seemed to big for that. Correct would be scrypt: Use libscrypt for the scrypt algorithm so... instead of emailing 4 people (three bug-wranglers plus one maintainer), you email around 300 people

Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in scrypt USE-Flag

2014-11-02 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 02/11/2014 17:48, Alex Xu a écrit : so... instead of emailing 4 people (three bug-wranglers plus one maintainer), you email around 300 people (assuming that subscriber count is around the same as #gentoo-dev users, which is probably a severe underestimate). Alex: no need for a snarky

Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in scrypt USE-Flag

2014-11-02 Thread Marco Ziebell
Am Sun, 02 Nov 2014 17:56:02 +0100 schrieb Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org: Le 02/11/2014 17:48, Alex Xu a écrit : so... instead of emailing 4 people (three bug-wranglers plus one maintainer), you email around 300 people (assuming that subscriber count is around the same as #gentoo-dev users,

Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in scrypt USE-Flag

2014-11-02 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 17:41:12 +0100 Marco Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote: There's a typo in the scrypt USE-FLAG. A bug-report seemed to big for that. Correct would be scrypt: Use libscrypt for the scrypt algorithm Found here: # equery u tor ... + - scrypt: Use

[gentoo-dev] terminal spreadsheet - sc fork

2014-11-02 Thread Andrés Martinelli
Hello there!! I am working on a terminal spreadsheet based on sc, but with some adds like undo/redo.. you can find it here: https://github.com/andmarti1424/scim Any new ideas and/or contribution is always welcome! Thanks! -- Andrés M.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] _dep_check_composite_db: fix bug #526160

2014-11-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 02:29:07 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: The fixes various forms of buggy behavior involving virtuals handling and EAPI 5 subslots. The code at fault is part of the support for bug #141118 (virtuals lookahead). This code was written long before subslots existed,

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: fix bug #526160

2014-11-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 18:05:54 -0700 zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: From: Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org This fixes _dep_check_composite_db to mask packages that aren't the highest visible match, but only if an update is desirable. This causes desirable updates to get pulled in for cases like bug

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] If a binhost file sets a TTL header, honor it.

2014-11-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:15:29 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 10/24/2014 12:24 PM, Zac Medico wrote: From 5400ba6ecbccf946aa4d5a8ddaaa2e1d7b784d3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David James davidja...@google.com Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:40:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] If a

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] LocationsManager: enable user package.bashrc

2014-11-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:22:15 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: In /etc/portage/profile, we already have support for using directories in the place of regular config files (portage1_directories = True). So, go ahead and enable package.bashrc there too. We could also support

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] GPG signed commits

2014-11-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:59:15 +0200 Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Friends, I accidentally pushed a GPG signed commit. This isn't a problem; merely pointless at this stage, as

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] LocationsManager: enable user package.bashrc

2014-11-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/02/2014 09:19 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: I'm a little confused. Is this a fix for Bertrands bashrc patches already applied? Or is it unrelated? It's a feature enhancement to add support for package.bashrc in /etc/portage/profile. Since /etc/portage/profile is not part of a repository,

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] LocationsManager: enable user package.bashrc

2014-11-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 09:27:07 -0800 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11/02/2014 09:19 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: I'm a little confused. Is this a fix for Bertrands bashrc patches already applied? Or is it unrelated? It's a feature enhancement to add support for package.bashrc in

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 3/3] Remove __eqalog __eqawarnlog

2014-11-02 Thread Michał Górny
Replaced by eqatag. --- bin/isolated-functions.sh | 23 --- bin/save-ebuild-env.sh| 2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/isolated-functions.sh b/bin/isolated-functions.sh index f03503b..42bf05d 100644 --- a/bin/isolated-functions.sh +++

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/3] Update the QA checks to new eqatag API

2014-11-02 Thread Michał Górny
--- bin/install-qa-check.d/05double-D | 8 bin/install-qa-check.d/90world-writable | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/install-qa-check.d/05double-D b/bin/install-qa-check.d/05double-D index 7d958f1..4b7737c 100644 ---

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/3] Introduce eqatag to output proper machine-readable QA logs

2014-11-02 Thread Michał Górny
The eqatag command syntax conforms to pre-GLEP describing install-qa-check.d. The qa.log file format strictly conforms to YAML for easy machine parsing. --- bin/isolated-functions.sh | 68 +++ bin/misc-functions.sh | 4 +++ bin/save-ebuild-env.sh

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/3] Introduce eqatag to output proper machine-readable QA logs

2014-11-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/02/2014 11:18 AM, Michał Górny wrote: The eqatag command syntax conforms to pre-GLEP describing install-qa-check.d. The qa.log file format strictly conforms to YAML for easy machine parsing. The whole series looks good to me. -- Thanks, Zac

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/5 v4] Add IndexStreamIterator and MultiIterGroupBy.

2014-11-02 Thread Zac Medico
This IndexStreamIterator class can be used together with the pkg_desc_index_line_read function to read an index file incrementally as a stream. The MultiIterGroupBy class can be used to iterate over multiple IndexStreamIterator instances at once, incrementally grouping results for a particular

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 3/3] CONFIG_PROTECT: protect symlinks, bug #485598

2014-11-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:35:19 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: Users may not want some symlinks to get clobbered, so protect them with CONFIG_PROTECT. Changes were required in the dblink.mergeme method and the new_protect_filename function. The changes to dblink.mergeme do 3