Hi,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:38:12 -0500
Wayne Chang wa...@neverfear.org wrote:
Hi All,
I got the latest ROS version running on Gentoo and packaged it into an
overlay. The closest overlay was ezod
(http://www.mavrinac.com/index.cgi?page=gentoo), but it wasn't getting
much love.
I've been
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:17:19 -0500
Alec Ten Harmsel a...@alectenharmsel.com wrote:
* It took over 4 hours
Fun!
* So many (~3MB output) warnings, especially upstream parallel
compilation bug... thought autoconf handled this, but I guess not
autoconf doesn't fix build systems like that.
On 11/19/14 10:17, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
Hey devs,
This is my first mail to this list. If this is out of line, let me know.
I've been playing around with Jenkins (continuous integration server)
recently for a couple of personal projects, including my own overlay. I
thought it would be
On 11/18/2014 02:12 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
On 11/18/2014 04:19 AM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Jauhien Piatlicki jauh...@gentoo.org writes:
It would be probably good to have in the tree only the core components and
move other stuff to the thematic overlays.
Then we can have a clear
On 11/19/2014 03:36 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 11/18/2014 02:12 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
On 11/18/2014 04:19 AM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Jauhien Piatlicki jauh...@gentoo.org writes:
It would be probably good to have in the tree only the core components and
move other stuff to the
On 11/19/2014 06:27 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
On 11/19/2014 03:36 PM, hasufell wrote:
In the end, I'm not sure if this is actually such a big problem. You can
still use random ebuilds from random overlays and commit them straight
to your own overlay.
A bad idea. Bad because of the same
# Ulrich Müller u...@gentoo.org (5 Nov 2014)
# Does not build with Emacs 24.4.
# Last visible upstream activity in 2011.
# Masked for removal in 30 days, bug #528374.
app-emacs/csharp-mode
Package has been fixed, so it won't be removed.
pgp3ETXZh_meX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:55:48 -0800 Zac Medico wrote:
On 11/17/2014 09:47 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
I use 2.2.14 on both hosts (and usually latest ~x86 portage is
there). I thought that running fixpackages should be enough to run
emerge with --dynamic-deps=n.
It depends on how
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:54 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/19/2014 06:27 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
On 11/19/2014 03:36 PM, hasufell wrote:
In the end, I'm not sure if this is actually such a big problem. You can
still use random ebuilds from random overlays and commit them
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:54:05 +0100
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
At that point it is forked. I don't see what's wrong with forking.
Forking wouldn't be the problem. Duplication of effort would be the
problem.
jer
Il 20/11/2014 00:58, Rich Freeman ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:54 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/19/2014 06:27 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
On 11/19/2014 03:36 PM, hasufell wrote:
In the end, I'm not sure if this is actually such a big problem. You can
still use
Il 20/11/2014 01:00, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:54:05 +0100
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
At that point it is forked. I don't see what's wrong with forking.
Forking wouldn't be the problem. Duplication of effort would be the
problem.
jer
worse, mutually
On 11/20/2014 12:58 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:54 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/19/2014 06:27 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
On 11/19/2014 03:36 PM, hasufell wrote:
In the end, I'm not sure if this is actually such a big problem. You can
still use random
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:36:11 +0100
viv...@gmail.com viv...@gmail.com wrote:
At that point it is forked. I don't see what's wrong with forking.
Forking wouldn't be the problem. Duplication of effort would be the
problem.
worse, mutually incompatibility would be much worse
I was talking
On 31 October 2014 09:28, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
So who wants to pick up the pieces now? Because I'm almost pissed off
enough to turn down the tinderbox and give a big FU to Gentoo already.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527608
More!
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:59:05 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:55:48 -0800 Zac Medico wrote:
[...]
When I'll manage to run emerge -DNupv @world without errors, I'll
send you stats for both runs with and without dynamic deps.
Great, hopefully that will reveal
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 31 October 2014 09:28, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
So who wants to pick up the pieces now? Because I'm almost pissed off
enough to turn down the tinderbox and give a big FU to Gentoo
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
But keep in mind that the core is supposed to shrink with this idea of a
distributed model! So it would be less work to actually roll/tag
releases than it would be right now (or even do that stuff in branches).
This doesn't
On 11/20/2014 04:03 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
But keep in mind that the core is supposed to shrink with this idea of a
distributed model! So it would be less work to actually roll/tag
releases than it would be right now (or
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
More! https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529788
Again, is somebody going to stand up and do something or can I shut
down my tinderbox and spend my free time playing Baldur's Gate?
If there are packages to be merged or unmerge, then bail out early
if /var/db/pkg is not writable (in order to avoid a fatal EROFS error
which would otherwise occur later on). Behavior remains unchanged for
--pretend mode. For --ask mode, it will bail out just after the last
relevant --ask prompt.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 07:49:00 -0800
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
If there are packages to be merged or unmerge, then bail out early
if /var/db/pkg is not writable (in order to avoid a fatal EROFS error
which would otherwise occur later on). Behavior remains unchanged for
--pretend
22 matches
Mail list logo
