On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 5:15 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/17/2015 07:15 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Alexander Berntsen
berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 17/04/15 16:33, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
The problem is double effort: previously one developer
On 04/18/2015 02:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
I am really confused. I guess some people have never really been in a
different workflow than gentoo to know that it's really not
state-of-the-art. And it really isn't. Not even for distros.
I am not saying that a review workflow is bad. I just
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:03 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Having a proper review workflow/platform increases the contribution
factor of the community. And not just that.
Define contribution factor. If you mean the number of people
writing patches vs the number of people with commit
The squashdelta module provides syncing via SquashFS snapshots. For the
initial sync, a complete snapshot is fetched and placed in
/var/cache/portage/squashfs. On subsequent sync operations, deltas are
fetched from the mirror and used to reconstruct the newest snapshot.
The distfile fetching
Dnia 2015-04-16, o godz. 10:38:22
Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 12:08:31 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
The squashdelta module provides syncing via SquashFS snapshots. For
the initial sync, a complete snapshot is fetched and placed in
# James Le Cuirot ch...@gentoo.org (18 Apr 2015)
# Old, unmaintained, not used by anything, and superseded by
# plexus-classworlds. There is a newer version in java-overlay that
# can't go yet but will go eventually. Removal in 30 days.
dev-java/classworlds
--
James Le Cuirot (chewi)
Gentoo
Our bug queue has 131 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
On 04/17/2015 04:33 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:50:00 +0200 hasufell wrote:
If you have followed the recent discussions about gentoos organizational
structure, review workflow and overlay situation you would know that
there is a pretty simple solution for this problem.
On 04/17/2015 07:15 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Alexander Berntsen
berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 17/04/15 16:33, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
The problem is double effort: previously one developer effort was
needed, now effort is doubled at least
You have correctly
On Saturday 18 April 2015 11:15:56 hasufell wrote:
On 04/17/2015 07:15 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Alexander Berntsen
berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 17/04/15 16:33, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
The problem is double effort: previously one developer effort was
On 04/17/2015 11:09 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2015, 19:27:13 schrieb hasufell:
High-quality overlays are the easiest way to contribute. I don't think
users should really have to care when or how an ebuild reaches the CVS
gentoo tree. Most projects already use
11 matches
Mail list logo