Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

> On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > --- > bin/phase-functions.sh | 9 + > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > diff --git a/bin/phase-functions.sh b/bin/phase-functions.sh > index 0b853bf..6a47fed 100644 > --- a/bin/phase-functions.sh > +++ b/bin/phase-functions.sh > @@ -593,6

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/9] check-reqs.eclass: Use eqawarn() from eutils.eclass

Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass index 4f74536..219023e 100644 --- a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass +++

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/9] check-reqs.eclass: Only inherit eclass once

Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass index d685f1f..4f74536 100644 --- a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass +++ b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ #

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/9] check-reqs.eclass: Mark interal function with @INTERNAL

Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass index 219023e..3c98baf 100644 --- a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass +++ b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass @@ -108,6

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 8/9] check-reqs.eclass: Require units for CHECKREQS_ in EAPIs > 5

Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass index 4513904..26f2dc1 100644 --- a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass +++ b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/9] Cleanup and EAPI=6 support for check-reqs.eclass

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 28/12/15 10:35, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:43:46 +0100 Justin Lecher wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> please review my suggestion to the check-reqs.eclass according to >> cleanups and EAPI=6 support. Any further ideas you

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 7/9] check-reqs.eclass: Sanitize MERGE_TYPE for EAPI < 4

Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass index ad032b9..4513904 100644 --- a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass +++ b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 9/9] check-reqs.eclass: Enable EAPI 6 support

Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass index 26f2dc1..d22e8c2 100644 --- a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass +++ b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass @@ -65,7

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/9] check-reqs.eclass: Fix typo

Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass index 3c98baf..138bfec 100644 --- a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass +++ b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass @@ -71,7

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/9] check-reqs.eclass: Replace obsolete df option -m with -B ###

Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass index 138bfec..a32f8f8 100644 --- a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass +++ b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass @@ -306,7

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 6/9] check-reqs.eclass: Ban obsolete functions in newer EAPIs

Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass index a32f8f8..ad032b9 100644 --- a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass +++ b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ esac

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/9] Cleanup and EAPI=6 support for check-reqs.eclass

Hi, On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:43:46 +0100 Justin Lecher wrote: > Dear all, > > please review my suggestion to the check-reqs.eclass according to cleanups > and EAPI=6 support. Any further ideas you like to see implemented? It would be useful to allow users to include swap space for memory

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/9] check-reqs.eclass: Replace obsolete df option -m with -B ###

Dnia 28 grudnia 2015 09:43:51 CET, Justin Lecher napisał(a): >Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher >--- > eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass >index

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New project: Crypto

[Sent from my iPad, as it is not a secured device there are no cryptographic keys on this device, meaning this message is sent without an OpenPGP signature. In general you should *not* rely on any information sent over such an unsecure channel, if you find any information controversial or

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/9] Cleanup and EAPI=6 support for check-reqs.eclass

Hi, On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 10:40:26 +0100 Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > On 28/12/15 10:35, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:43:46 +0100 Justin Lecher wrote: > >> please review my suggestion to the check-reqs.eclass according to > >> cleanups and EAPI=6 support. Any further ideas

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New project: Crypto

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > > [Sent from my iPad, as it is not a secured device there are no cryptographic > keys on this device, > meaning this message is sent without an OpenPGP signature. In general you > should *not* rely on > any

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/9] check-reqs.eclass: Replace obsolete df option -m with -B ###

Hi, On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:43:51 +0100 Justin Lecher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher > --- > eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass > index 138bfec..a32f8f8

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/9] check-reqs.eclass: Replace obsolete df option -m with -B ###

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 28/12/15 14:58, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:43:51 +0100 Justin Lecher wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- >> eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 >> deletion(-)

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] check-reqs.eclass: Replace obsolete df option -m with -k

Using kbi as base unit for calculation as linux and bsd only have -k as common option Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 25 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New project: Crypto

On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:42:40 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand > wrote: > > > > > > [Sent from my iPad, as it is not a secured device there are no > > cryptographic keys on this device, meaning this message is

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Replace df -m with df -k

I replaced al calculations from mbi to kbi so that we can use the common -k flag. Justin Justin Lecher (1): check-reqs.eclass: Replace obsolete df option -m with -k eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 25 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- 2.6.4

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New project: Crypto

[Sent from my iPad, as it is not a secured device there are no cryptographic keys on this device, meaning this message is sent without an OpenPGP signature. In general you should *not* rely on any information sent over such an unsecure channel, if you find any information controversial or

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/9] check-reqs.eclass: Replace obsolete df option -m with -B ###

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 28/12/15 15:24, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 28 grudnia 2015 09:43:51 CET, Justin Lecher > napisał(a): >> Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher --- >> eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/9] check-reqs.eclass: Replace obsolete df option -m with -B ###

Dnia 28 grudnia 2015 15:28:53 CET, "Justin Lecher (jlec)" napisał(a): >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA512 > >On 28/12/15 15:24, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 28 grudnia 2015 09:43:51 CET, Justin Lecher >> napisał(a): >>> Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New project: Crypto

[Sent from my iPad, as it is not a secured device there are no cryptographic keys on this device, meaning this message is sent without an OpenPGP signature. In general you should *not* rely on any information sent over such an unsecure channel, if you find any information controversial or

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] check-reqs.eclass: Replace obsolete df option -m with -k

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 28/12/15 16:41, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 28 grudnia 2015 16:27:43 CET, Justin Lecher > napisał(a): >> Using kbi as base unit for calculation as linux and bsd only have >> -k as common option > > It's 'kibibyte', or KiB in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] check-reqs.eclass: Replace obsolete df option -m with -k

Dnia 28 grudnia 2015 16:27:43 CET, Justin Lecher napisał(a): >Using kbi as base unit for calculation as linux and bsd only have -k as >common option It's 'kibibyte', or KiB in short. > >Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher >--- > eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 25

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New project: Crypto

On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:42:40 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand > wrote: > > > > > > [Sent from my iPad, as it is not a secured device there are no > > cryptographic keys on this device, > > meaning this message is sent without an

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New project: Crypto

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 28 Dec 2015, at 15:58, James Le Cuirot wrote: >> >> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:42:40 -0500 >> Rich Freeman wrote: > >>> And this would be why I don't bother to sign my emails

[gentoo-dev] Need clear semantics for packages with binary entities

I’m suffering from the fact that users can distinguish packages containing binaries just by eye. There is no mechanism to allow/ignore such packages. For license restrictions we have ‘package.license/’ whitelist. I figure out the following binary entities in portage’s packages that (to my point

Re: [gentoo-dev] Need clear semantics for packages with binary entities

On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:24:14 +0300 trupa...@gmail.com wrote: > I’m suffering from the fact that users can distinguish packages containing > binaries just by eye. There is no mechanism to allow/ignore such packages. > For license restrictions we have ‘package.license/’ whitelist. > > I figure out